Search results

Shouldn't we adjust to HS numbers if we're trying to apply this to the guys we're evaluating in HS? That seems to me the more apples to apples comparison, though admittedly I'm not sure those numbers are out there. With more The Opening style events with verified testing, I'd guess it's...

I think it's only fair to point out the website you pulled the stats from itself gives the following disclaimers: Height and weight: These are the average sizes of current college football players—they don’t represent how big athletes were when they first entered college. In other words...

For clarity, are the UGA and Bama numbers listed in the QP their weight coming in from HS, or leaving college to the pros? Assuming the latter, but I don't think it takes away from your point either way, I'm more curious what that might indicate from an evaluation perspective.

Agreed. I will also point out that size doesn't always equal durability at RB. Sure, there is a correlation, but it isn't a straight line. Parrish and Knighton were more durable than Chaney and Citizen over the last two seasons.

Depends. Can he can tie his shoes without bending or kneeling, and outrun a coked out gazelle? Maybe then.... ...maybe.