Search results

The only person attempting anything personal is you. I don't have to lie a single time. You have to lie in every single thread.

You need to start being more precise and not so unhinged.

So when confronted with a lie, you go snarky and avoid aditting it. Par for the course.

No, I corrected your statement that Jim Morris had never won on the road. That's false.

Another lie. I posted the quote and it wasn't what you claimed. You are a serial fabricator.

I'm just correcting your constant lies and misstatements.

No, I didn't. As I've shown by actually quoting my own post. One of my favorite posts of yours was the one where you claimed that you were literally quoting me while you were literally lying.

Jim Morris has beaten great teams in the postseason before.

You have to resort to these cutesy and snarky responses because your entire argument is nonsense. Logical fallacies and temper tantrums are argument. That's what you do.

I don't regret it because what I said was clear to any honest person. You keep lying because you have no other choice.

You don't even understand simple logic. And you have invent metrics like road wins in Regionals and wins against #1 seeds. A team can get to the CWS and, in fact, win it without beating a #1 seed.

Yeah, your second statement does not follow the first. What you're trying to do is refute the statement that road teams aren't supposed to win by saying that, well, 10 of them did this year. But road teams aren't supposed to win. That's how tournaments are built, especially ones with home...

This is still a lie even if you repeat it 100 times.

This is a non sequitur.

Nobody disputed that they "can" do it. You're still having completely different arguments than everybody else. You struggle terribly with these concepts. And Bethune-Cookman has never beaten Miami in the postseason. They're 0-4. Based on your track record, this number should enrage you. You...

We didn't have a 0% winning percentage on the road. And an 8 game sample size over, what, 7 years is not that representative.

Again, I cited straight probability of an event occurring. It wasn't a prediction.

Spectacularly wrong. Embarrassingly wrong. Please read a book about randomness and probability. We can predict distributions of random events if we know their probability!

No, it's not my fault that you don't understand probability and randomness.

You're absolutely wrong and it's obvious. What's funny is that you clearly capitulated in the past because you knew this as well. But now you're trying to Google conventional definitions of random to save face. Say that the 2016 Miami team played Bethune-Cookman in a 7 game series. Everybody...