Search results

Ok not a 4-3 but we need to go to a hybrid 3-4 that uses 4-3 concepts like LSU. The Striker is trash and the 4-2-5 scheme is trash overall. If you look at every college team that uses the 4-2-5 as its base the one thing they all have in common is that over time they become soft.

Exactly which is why I said our linebackers would be better off... our secondary would be too, less thinking and more attacking. if you want our linebackers to get 120 tackles a season then this is the route to go... or go with a hybrid 3-4 like LSU.

So why isn’t teams like LSU, Bama, Clemson, UGa, Ohio State all using a “striker” if every play is being run with 3 WRs or more and this is the best way to stop it?? How many interceptions or passes defended have you seen from the striker position?? They aren’t athletic enough to cover slot...

Lol the striker position is trash... Finley has 5 total tackles all game and he “was our best player on the field” Saturday??

Romeo is gone after this season and he’s not our best player?? He barely makes any plays from the striker position he would have made more of an impact from the strong safety position.

Telvin Smith was an undersized lber in college and in the NFL... Carter is limited in space as a safety but would make a great WLB in a 4-3.

Obvious plays were there is 3 or 4 WRs on the field we go with a nickel or Dime package... traditional lineup using cbs not “Strikers” that can’t cover for ****.

This 4-2-5, 3-3-5 scheme is trash. Every scheme has a weakness but I’m tired of seeing us get gashed in these one on ones with nobody else in the area except the corner or Striker that got beat. Also We don’t have enough DBs to keep playing this kind of scheme. Next season players like Sam...