Search results

$100,000 to the person who has evidence that I went to UF for one day. $100,000.

Thanks for adding to the conversation.

Jagr: "Vanderbilt and TCU have certainly been stellar. Miami has not." Piccolo: "The facts don't agree." Jagr: "In the last decade there is no comparison." Piccolo: "Last decade CWS Appearances Vandy: 3 Miami: 2" How did TCU drop out of that conversation?

"I'm told that their programs and teams are "stellar" not that they've achieved more impressive feats." Then....... "Last decade CWS Appearances Vandy: 3 Miami: 2" What happened to "teams" within six posts?

How did TCU disappear between post #186 and post #192?

When Super Regionals are no longer in your favor, change it to just CWS appearances......except when TCU has more CWS appearances, in which case you stop talking about TCU. I win.

You don't even understand that listing Vandy and Miami is making a comparison?

When beaten, change your talking points.

That's what you write when you get beat. This was all about TCU, Vandy, and Miami. When you decided to look at the last decade's CWS appearances, TCU suddenly disappeared. Why? 5 to 2 is why.

But you did. It was important to you. When it killed your point (7 to 3) you dropped it.

Yes you did. You made a comparison between Vandy and Miami in the last decade. The only difference, though, is that you changed what you were comparing. Three.

Last 16 years? 8 SUPER REGIONALS!!! Last 10 years? WE ONLY LOOK AT CWS APPEARANCES!!!

Except that you left it out and only included Vandy. 5-2 isn't a comparison anymore, that's why you left it out.

You included Super Regionals when you went back to 2003. When you started looking at the last decade, you dropped Super Regional appearances.

Except that you stopped comparing Super Regional appearances.

So you decided to go to the "highest possible bar" after including three different measurements the first time. Three Super Regionals. Sad.

All you do is deflect. Three Super Regional appearances. That's why you stopped bringing them up. Why did you leave TCU out in the CWS comparison?

You left them out because it killed your point. When you include ancient history, HEY LOOK AT THE SUPER REGIONALS, when you can't use 2003-2008, all of a sudden we don't hear anything about Super Regionals.

You avoided Super Regional appearances because it is embarrassing to Jim's legacy that you're trying to perpetuate. You made sure to include them back when you tried to make 2003-2008 relevant.

YOU care about Super Regional appearances, so why did you only post them when they worked in your favor? It's okay. We know.