Search results

We've also heard that Zo was very impressive in his interview with a detailed plan. It's not impossible that Nunez was equally impressive. Or there's nothing behind any of it. Who knows?

We don't really know anything yet other than the names they want us to know.

Have you seen Tony Hernandez?

Because he tied himself to Manny, sink or swim. And they sunk. Like I just said, he's not the worst option mentioned. There's no need for pitchforks if he's the choice, but I'm not adding Eddie Alvarez-Nunez to my AD trading card set either.

And it's been that way for a long time, except for what? two seasons? Maybe football isn't their priority because of hiring Alonzo? Maybe Nunez is a red herring. All I'm saying is that Nunez isn't the worst choice we could get. Hernandez just might be though.

No, I'm suggesting that there might be additional factors other than simply win-loss ratios.

I'm very well aware of that, but I'm also aware that the University of New Mexico is largely a ****show with a tiny budget and the last two season have impacted all sports, especially in states with lockdowns.

So he should only get credit for his time at the top? He had 14 years in management roles at LSU and it means nothing? But sure, judge him completely off his record at a crappy school with a tiny budget.

Are you saying that being Musk's second in command wouldn't be a selling point?

Does he get credit for LSU's record while he was there?