Search results

I have a box for that. I don’t have a box for lay people who have nothing to gain who blindly agree.

There are some policy blind spots that blow my mind. The ultimate example (and a parallel here) is being pro energy/emission restrictions and yet anti-nuclear. It’s literally the cleanest and most abundant super energy in human history. It solves everyone’s problems, has the best chance of...

I assume it’s because they don’t find fault with them, but with their access to weapons. It isn’t the stance I take, just restating what I’ve heard from them.

There is no equating that he said and your response. You will disagree, I will say it’s moot, just don’t do it again.

You can have that opinion and not express it in the way you chose. It’s personal and disrespectful, and won’t be allowed moving forward. Glad to hear it won’t be occurring.

I haven’t followed this thread much to drop in and see this suggests the plot has been lost. This is a serious issue in all sides, it’s extremely difficult to discuss, but we can’t go at each other here with this level of vitriol. Loosen up or talk about something else, everyone. I don’t post...

Revoke qualified immunity. Most people aren’t aware it exists until something like this happens, or a cop murdering a civilian gains national prominence.

Was just about to link this article.

I assume you’re really angry but this comes off as callous and unserious. It’s like using the definition of homeostasis to justify or demonize abortion. I know nobody here would do that. I had to pull my car over I was crying so hard over Sandy Hook. I’ve never owned a gun, but I’m generally...