Search results

They took 2 of 3 from TCU, probably will be Top 3 in next poll.

Did you watch this weekends series? They looked pretty solid vs TCU

I guess, both are shutouts you never had a chance in. How about we lose like 14-7? I prefer that. With our pitching/lack of hitting we aren't holding any 1 seeds to less than 5.

Fair enough, I expect more from the committee but that's just me. I'm so over this team right now and even though we are young I'm skeptical what the future brings with this staff, even if we do keep racking up Top 5 classes. But I will keep watching, that's what fans do.

I care, and if we get a seed like that the committee should care as well, that's their f-cking job...... somehow you can't grasp that and take the "well sure you ****ed on my face...but I was thirsty soooo" approach to it. No matchup gets us to Omaha with this team, but I still want to be...

They are not Vandy or Arkansas, but they are **** good and likely make Omaha where pitching rules, any team with a staff ERA under 3 can throw. That said we are going no where, we are so bad right now that 40 plus games in we don't have a set rotation let alone even know who our #1 is. That...

The 3 at the 16......... matched with #1 overall on the other side. :20161020-221306th:

Hajjar and Weston (UM pitchers) are both plus pitchers, better than any starter we have. And as far as Texas goes they are **** good, 36-11 and rarely ever lose at home....you must be watching the wrong games. Their team ERA is 2.9, we are 4.6. Their weekday starter would be our Friday night guy.

Well you completely missed the point, again. The 22 RPI does not deserve to be the 3 at the 9. That is simple logic.

You do realize our staff has to pitch to them as well? Look we aren't making it, but the 56th projected seed for a 22 RPI is wrong, not even debatable

Of course it does, thats literally why they seed them. LOL. Michigan us a 90 RPI and the 2, that's good for us but BS overall

Like I said RPI is 22, that seed would be below 40. I will let you do the math. And again I have been HIGHLY critical of this team, but that's not right, despite you porst..... RPI has always been a decent and fair predictor of NCAA seedings for the most part.

Than a 3 in the 8 overall seeds region with a Top 22 RPI? Are you serious or new to college baseball?? LMAO and I think we stink, but that's a joke, if you ranked it by seedings that has us around 40... smh

:pgdead:

AUSTIN LUBBOCK 1. Texas (8) 1. Texas Tech (9) 4. Stony Brook* 4. Northeastern* 2. Michigan 2. Arizona State 3. Miami