Search results

You're right my mistake. I was looking at the wrong column. Appreciate the clarification.

I got the TFL numbers from ESPN, There's no discussing much more if your go to is Clemson when making comparisons. https://www.espn.com/college-football/boxscore?gameId=401234614

Man if you’re counting on drops and misthrows to make a case you’re totally reaching. If that’s the case start counting the missed PI call and Payton losing his shoe.

We did skull **** Pitt's offense. That's the point. 9 points allowed 3-17 on 3rd down 0-2 on 4th down 22 yards rushing 300 total yards QB completion rate under 50%-QBR of 39 15 TFLS 4 Sacks That is a dominant performance by any measure.

I'm not sure what point you are continuing to make, especially after watching college football every Saturday. Week in and week out just about every defense in college football looks like crap against a competent offense. Who is this team beating up on Top 25-40 offenses? Imo our defense is...

Yet they went 3-17 on third down and 0-2 on 4th. Let me guess at your answer “Back up QB bro!”

He had to throwe the ball nearly 50 times to get to those 277 yards. He didn't even complete half his passes and ended up with a QBR of 39. You throw around the term padded stats a lot. Well if that 277 isn't one, you should never throw that term around again.

He didn't even complete half his passes and needed 46 throws to get to 270 yards.

Coe on dude, be better than that response. Clemson is going to do that or far worse to almost everyone, if not everyone. There is no college defense that is going to stop Lawrence and Etienne this season.

Pitt was 3-19 on 3rd and 4th down.