Search results

they did finished ranked above us and beat our *** like our name was zed and they worked for marsellus wallace.

we talkin all you can eat type buffet meals or like sammiches and stuff? /would write letter of rec

roflmao QP appears to be a grad student or failed grad student in law school. Who says stuff like this? It sounds like something the longhaired dork said in Good Will Hunting right before Matt Damon went off on him.

it’s so manny. he’s car rich house poor.

The thrust of the post you responded to was that we got Blake James because the few BOT members who cared about athletics essentially gave up trying after their disastrous support for the hire of Eichorst. That may well be true. I certainly didn’t disagree with it. The question is why you...

i think it’s a great observation. the reason we’re doing this is gaping roster holes from bad and lazy recruiting, bad roster management and a culture where too many kids leave early. so i understand the need and can’t even disagree with using the portal as part of the solution - i just agree...

you baselessly claim others don’t understand hiring or it’s ‘nuances,’ but actually tell us nothing about either topic. you just repeat generalities and claim you’re so smart. you can defend anything. except it’s all wrong. the red flags around golden were actually and easily identified by...

No offense, but you sound clueless. First you dismiss the person you’re talking to without knowing anything that justifies your contention, then you regurgitate blah blah generalities that are inapplicable to the situation you’re trying to defend. you’re just wrong on the golden hire, which...

lol. what ‘analyzing’ are you doing? the history you refer to is a history of failure. bad ADs, bad hiring processes, bad institutional oversight. it sucks and should change, and there’s nothing deep or analytical about observing that it probably won’t.

Why do people keep saying isht like this? What is a ‘Golden type hire’? Golden was awful. The only thing I can figure out is people liked how he looked. His background was overrated, his approach was a fail, he’s not a leader. If he were a real HC he’d have found an opportunity already. He...

lol. it’s a pretty common phrasing.

We can't even get our guys to run basic assignments with precision and consistency. Our issue isn't just evaluations (and I've been harping on evals as long as anyone here). Our issue includes roster management, development, game planning, S&C. A lot of areas that leverage data and planning...

There's two different discussions going on here. Obviously all money can be wasted, and all effort can be. So obviously no infrastructure guarantees results. I agree, I just don't find there to be much interesting to say on that topic. Get a new AD? Ok. Get a new HC? Ok. To me, the...

Not sure. First is irrelevant to a discussion board. We don't control either decision. I'd change ADs immediately. Not my choice. I'm discussing what needs fixing. If you think it's pointless to discuss one thing until the other thing is fixed, then you're being pretty linear. Helps to...

Not sure if we're talking by each other. Yes we need to fix the leadership here. But we're attempting to drive a go-card around a race track at this point. Better driver would help for sure, but the first thing a better driver is going to do is pull into the pit and ask for an actual car with...

lmao. you claim to know and insult the experience or success of people you don’t know, but i can’t do adult discussions. turns out i can, just not apparently with you. that’s okay.

Sorry man, you're apparently illiterate. You try to disagree with everything, and apparently can't even process what you read. Any time someone hypes their own success or imagines they know others' success or lack thereof from an anonymous message board, there's really no point in the exchange.

I'm talking about fixing the process as well. The process of running a team. Because not sure what else there is to say. Yes we should fire the AD and get a real staff. Okay. Agreed. Nothing more interesting to say there. But how should a better AD and staff actually run a CFB team in...

Wrong. You just don't get the concept of preparation. This has nothing to do with asymmetry. At all. Asymmetry is what you apply on field - if you can. Their guys are pretty **** fast and skilled, not just big. But there's no set of kids or scheme we're going to run with that isn't...

I see a lot of ‘can’t match alabama so why bother try to improve’ in this thread and elsewhere. I also see arguments that suggest that there’s nothing to learn from saban because his success hasn’t been replicated by his assistants. both seem like really uninteresting assessments. What...