Search results

Take em both?

Skepticism is fine, but your rationale stinks. You’re not being skeptical, you’re being cynical.

Our staff has been here for 5 months, and this is your view?

Maybe, but also lowest floor. Just looks more one dimensional to me. I get that he is long, and quick. But also thin. And unclear how tough.

Ah good, thought I’d heard he was a decommit or risk thereof. Like him as a prospect more than c williams, imo.

I agree on all that. Not sold on Riggins. Like the Pinder dude Paranos is onto. Want them to find a really tough interior guy. Or a big NT disruptor. Would also like them to try to get Anaele back on board. The LB sit is dire. We have plenty of DBs. Overall roster is 2 years away from...

I wrote ‘maybe.’ We dont know. Other schools manage to keep talented seniors. Maybe watching his former teammates slip in the draft while Clemson seniors rise up will help him see the light.

If they think Moise and Riggins commits means they’re done at DT, then I am officially concerned about this staff’s recruiting. They should be trying to get kids who are better than those two. Moreover there is some talk that Moise could end up at OG. And Riggins is not a local kid and should...

I disagree we have a numbers issue here. At DT, for ‘20, we will have Silvera as a JR., Ford as a SR., plus Miller and the ‘19 Frosh, who aren’t even here yet. So basically, one guy who to date has underperformed, one guy who was a reach kid and redshirted, and three guys who have never suited...

I hope we don’t settle for plan b guys or under-recruit DL. We need to stack the deck there. One okay cycle and the guys ain't even here year. Starting with Coker, every staff we have had follows a good class at a position group with the ‘less need’ theory next cycle. Over time it destroys...