Search results

We're finally looking like we're getting towards where we've needed to be for 20 years.

What does that even mean? There's nothing new about 25 ICs or 85 roster numbers. The portal isn't this new big deal people make it out to be. It's just a centralized way to transfer. Teams have been playing underclassmen for ages and will continue to. Not because of the portal. Because...

I'm fine with 3. 4 seems like too many and will cost us at DE and elsewhere. If we're expecting significant true frosh contributions from any DEs, we're in a world of hurt. That happens rarely. Assuming we need to leave an IC open each year for a transfer at a need spot, we can only take...

We need to win. We need to evaluate better. We need to be competitive ('in the game') for top kids. If we can't figure out how to do that, we're going to be relegated to fluffer.

I hear you re stewart but the comment I responded to was re Kenyata jackson. btw., our boosters should step up for stewart and establish a bit of we will defend our house type trail stuff.

If we do our job right it shouldn't be an uphill battle everywhere. Staying home, playing for the hometown team, getting to NFL (our DEs do that well), it's an attractive situation. If we can't offer anything remotely competitive, that's the fault of our boosters. I get it bags for some top...

Hope we don't fall back into the over-recruit under-recruit oscillating cycle we've been in the past 20 years. Taking 4 DEs in a year is just a recipe for roster headache in most instances. Someone transfers out because they're behind, the next year's class is weak because 'logjam', and you're...