Search results

The Supreme Court decision involved TV rights. It didn't change the substantive rules of game. That's the problem here. We would be changing a system that works in crowning the best team and maintaining the best regular season in sports. This is the fundamental disagreement. I don't know...

College football has never been about parity. Was there parity when Miami won 4 out of 9 championships? In the 7 years of the playoff era, 5 different programs have won the national title. In the 7 years before that, 5 different programs won the title. In the 7 years before that, 6 different...

How did the CFP trivialize bowl games? There used to be 1 championship bowl game, maybe 2. Now there are 3. The other games never meant anything but pride. The argument for the CFP was making sure we crowned the best team. It has obviously accomplished its purpose. Now we're blaming the system...

CBB regular season is terrible. Nobody cares if Duke or Kentucky is losing on a Wednesday because the tournament is what matters. When the #1 team is losing in the CFB regular season, it's must-see TV.

Aside from the 3-4 top teams, bowl games have never been part of the championship picture. The opt-outs make them worse but it’s still just free football in the holiday season. It’s also nice to get a head start on next year’s team.

Clemson wasn't Clemson when the playoffs started in 2014. They earned their way into the club by doing things right. Just because we're mad at the results doesn't mean we need to change the rules. This kind of tournament turns college football into college hoops. And that's terrible.

This is the dumbest idea in the history of college sports. The four-team playoff works. There is no argument otherwise, presently or historically. It would’ve worked in 2000 and it works now. This idiotic proposal would ruin the best regular season in sports.