Search results

I am confused. Are you suggesting that $$$ is the real reason we perform the way we perform?

Blake was a failure way before that. You also left out that we paid $4MM to Temple for the rights to promote our DC from a failed regime.

James should have never been AD in the first place. His whole tenure is epic failure, way before Manny. What makes you think Manny failing, which many of us knew would happen, changes that?

Timer for what? You think Blake James is being fired?

That is clearly subjective. I am just stating that these immaterial moves only delay the obvious (clearly not obvious for all). Fire this guy (e.g. Baker) or the next guy or the next guy. Which loser is hiring those losers? Which loser hired the head loser? For once, I want to see someone...

It does what? You still have a tremendous loser at HC. You still have the biggest loser at AD. The worst part...neither of these mooks can stand at a podium and address a crowd without standing on 15 phonebooks.

Fire this guy, fire the next guy. Which loser hired those losers? Which loser hired the HC? None of it matters until we fire actual relevant people and change the system. So ********** with sandpaper to the dream of changing some assistants. That really sets us on the right path. We can...

OP, You asked an immaterial question. The only relevant questions: 1. Why is Blake James employed? 2. When does UM get serious and bring in a competent AD with passion and autonomy?