Search results

This right here is the freshest of air.

My guess is they'll be blaming "the administration" for only winning by an average of 25 points.

I suppose if we're gonna take the "it's the 1980's and we're gonna do everything that way" approach to managing a college football program... sure?

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, and I'd bet you've never spent one literal second on campus.

How about... hold on.... how... how about.... stay with me here..... how.... urgh....you.... how about you..... It's just an idea.... I know, it's weird. Could you, maybe..... Just give $5,000 to the University of Miami football program, that you love so, SO much? It just might be more...

In fairness, this is partially my point. The University of Miami operates just like any other private institution. If you have the money, you make the rules. You're standing across the street complaining about the color of the building. At best, I bought a week pass to use the pool. The...

Don't get me started man. If you want to make change, write a check. End of story. I'll remind you, there's a University at the Miami Hurricanes Football Program.

FSU is maybe a four-win team. Them beating anyone that beats a top-20 program would be absolutely ridiculous.

While persnickety, certainly accurate.

When it comes to the HC at Miami, the Board tells Blake (or any other AD) what to do. It's not like a big state school where the AD has relative autonomy (accompanied by an enormous athletic budget).

Given more games and the overwhelming SEC bias, I'd argue it's more possible now than ever for a two-loss team to win a natty.

9-3 regular season is a huge failure IMO. Would mean a loss to Bama, UNC and another team we really should beat.

I mean, it's not like there's any deep-seeded trauma there.

It's completely fairly the biggest indictment on Manny. I attribute it to being a new HC. If he doesn't figure that out soon, he won't last much longer, despite many other things going well overall. I honestly think we see a lot less of it this season. Year 2 in Lashlee/King offense, Diaz...

I don't disagree with you. But if you don't think we're quite there, I think you're talking about the expectation, not the ceiling. Bear in many our wins last year were dogfights, except OSU, and we win that game if either 1) King doesn't get hurt or 2) the tipped ball for an INT is called an...

I'd argue the ceiling is realistically 11 regular season wins. We're talented and experienced enough to beat everyone but Alabama on paper. We get UNC off a bye (which, yes, I understand hasn't been a good thing, but should be) and the home stretch of games is pretty easy. No late season trap...

It is possible (though admittedly extremely unlikely) to win the natty with both of those losses. I'll always prioritize rings.

You can't speak in absolutes about this stuff. Yes, we should win ten games. But might we lose in a late season road game by one point at the end of the game after someone suffers a key injury? Would that be "acceptable?" What if we beat the brakes off Alabama, we're their only loss en route...