Search results

Instead you just get passive aggressive like a female.

It's a silly strawman argument that doesn't change the point and there is no factual evidence to point to support that he would be a unique circumstance. Everyone understands that players weight fluctuates...but that's all players. Gibbs doesn't change dramatically different than other RBs...

This is two team sites and the combine. All say the same thing. But you promise he wasn't. Lol ok.

Gibbs has been listed...by three different sources over years (plural) at 199-200...but you claim he played 7 pounds lighter. Care to show your work or are you just making **** up?

Bad example. But I get your point. Gibbs was listed at 200 at Bama, listed at 200 at Georgia Tech, weighed in at the combine at 199, and was at 191 per 247 in HS. Yeah, he basically showed up at that weight. Also, the average BMI in the NFL at RB has jumped from 29.1 in the 80s to 30.8 in...

That is not completely true, but there has been misunderstanding of the ultimate point bshaw was presenting throughout. What does it have to do with UM? - this comes down to your opinion on the way to construct your roster. You would have no problem with this topic if we were on the topic of...

The key problem is that some people do not understand the concept you are even presenting. That isn't your fault...no one here has even bothered to run a simple google search that would show them that your take is not some bird brained concept. The idea of BMI being an important indicator for...

This thread is getting bumped many times in the future.

Don't miss the forest with the trees with what @bshaw28 is saying...and he's right. Individually, all of those players have something to like and are potentially good players, but it is not wise roster construction to have a roster filled with <190lb running backs. <190lb is having a bunch of...