Search results

Lol. Literally 3 out of the 4 RB's you mentioned are in the NFL.

Except this is the only thing that matters. I'm not saying Cam is better, I'm saying you can't say Lo is better "based off what he did early in the season" when he did that against bad comp with more chances. I'm also saying that it doesn't matter who is better, because getting on the Cam...

Bruh... you did not just compare the stats when Lingard got literally all his carries against Toledo, FIU, and Savannah St, while most of Harris stats are against ACC comp. But regardless, no, the starting QB argument is not the same as the starting RB argument. 1 QB plays, while 2-3 RB's can...

I literally said in my post that Cam played more due to Lingard being injured. It is a fact that not only do we have a larger sample size for Cam, but his carries came against conference competition in clutch moments. Lingard did great and had more reps when he was healthy but against lesser...

Bias? Cam has played more due to Lingard being injured. No way for us to hype him up if he's coming off an injury and hasn't had any serious playing time when the other 2 RBs infront of him has been successful already. You're projecting him to be best based on his high school performance while...