Search results

New York measures were in place for months. Do we really have to compare what Florida did/has done as a state to what measures were in place in NYC? Seriously?

Sweden has a population of 10 million. They’re also outpacing neighboring counties in deaths and infections. Their own PM ordered and investigation into the shutdown and it seems inevitable that they make some changes. I’m not sure that anyone currently sees their approach as a success.

I know what California did. California saw success because of the early measures they put in place. They opened up too quickly and voila, here we are. Florida and Texas never really shut down, which is why we’re seeing what we’re seeing now. The idea that New York plateaued because of an earlier...

We plateaued because of the measures put in place. If New York didn’t put the measures in place that it did for as long, it would’ve been worse. Look at California and that completely cuts against your argument. They eased restrictions and are now back skyrocketing.

We have 7million plus people here, so I’m not sure that really adds up. We just successfully flattened the curve with a more intense and prolonged shutdown than most of the country. We don’t even have solid data on what the antibodies actually mean yet.

But spikes haven’t happened everywhere. NYC numbers are plummeting and we had MASSIVE protests here. You can’t tell people to not believe everything “they” tell you, then tell us to trust you while you’re not citing any actual data that aligns with what we’re seeing.

The early indications are that they won’t, especially if their season is played in full.

NFL also has suggested they aren’t willing to move the draft back to accommodate CFB. So this seems a lot less feasible for that reason. A bunch of top guys would seemingly sit out.