Search results

Sigh. Yes, yes they were. Objectively, they were. You have to accept their ratings as given as a proxy for how heavily they were recruited, otherwise you conflate the evaluation of their talent, recruitment, and development. It's not perfect but it works pretty well, especially in the aggregate...

Lmao. You sound quite intelligent. Another data point supporting my original statement.

Oh this makes me reconsider. Hmm, so you're telling me the guys who have been on campus 6 months and the guys who haven't even been on campus yet are unproven? Well darn. I guess we should get a coach who manages to bring in all of those proven 6-star high school players. --- Welcome to...

I had 2 responses to my comment that anyone who hates on our defenses coaches is a moron. One was a guy who can't add and the other was this really insightful ALL CAPS rebuttal. Yeah, I feel pretty good about my original statement. (Obviously the defensive coaches are human and should be...

Are you bad at math? Lol. If Dunson commits that'll be 6 4-stars in 3 years, and 8 corners overall in 3 years. Given that we play a striker on almost every down, that is plenty.

He got 2 last cycle, and 3 before that. He consistently gets pretty good players and develops them. The fans who hate on our defensive coaches are absolute morons. They're not perfect but nobody is. The defensive coaches all do a nice job evaluating, bringing in talent, and developing guys.