Search results

  1. C

    The latest with Romello Height

    No it was in reference to us not needing DL. Height is gone and there’s better options.
  2. C

    The latest with Romello Height

    I posted earlier in spring that people saying we didn’t need DL would have a different take later on , just like rb when we finished the HS class / portal. We were “ fine “ there too. Unlike fans coaches know who’s leaving and their roster management.
  3. C

    The latest with Romello Height

    👀
  4. C

    The latest with Romello Height

    Bryant playing Mike was insane to me , he never had the fluidity to be there. I harped on that one making no sense then in the BCU game thread I reiterated that guy is completely lost and has no business there. He might need some time to get acclimated to things but I like him a lot more at his...
  5. C

    The latest with Romello Height

    Putting 230 pounders in there every down is a bad recipe. If you play those types it’s in situational spots or blow outs. Depending on that every down if injuries happen ( and they will) is irresponsible roster management.
  6. C

    The latest with Romello Height

    Depending on true Fr DL as depth is lunacy lol. If you need evidence watch last year. Bain is a once a decade type player that was physically ready. You saw what happens when the vets went down , he ran out of steam and the younger guys wasn’t ready. You want grown ups in the trenches. Not...
  7. C

    The latest with Romello Height

    Five are true Fr , most of them are under sized and Blount is a future DT down the road that reclassified. We need a rotational guy. That’s not enough proven guys that are ready, it would be foolish to roll with what we have after last year.
  8. C

    The latest with Romello Height

    This is a positive. He could’ve always committed there but he waited.
Back
Top