Search results

Can't agree that Tampa elevated Brady. Tampa hadn't been to the playoffs in 12 years before Brady got there. He won a Super Bowl immediately. On the other hand, Cleveland had been to the playoffs 5 of the 6 years prior to Belichick. The sixth year was a disaster so they hired Belichick. He had...

As much as people talk about Shula falling off, he was 39-25 over his final four years. A much better finish than the disgraced cheater.

Seems like Belichick is still looking for work. Must feel like Harold Melvin without Teddy Pendergrass.

If Belichick can win Super Bowls with defense, why is he incapable of winning regular season games with defense (without Brady)? He's not even mediocre without Brady. He's awful. Wannstedt had a much better record.

He is a great defensive coach. As a head coach, he was a loser before Brady, and he was a loser after Brady. He's had 11 years to prove he can win without Brady, and has failed spectacularly. The Pats were 5-13 in Belichick's first 18 games as head coach. Same defensive mind. Then they...

That defense didn't help Pro Bowl QB Drew Bledsoe. They went 5-13. As for the two Super Bowls, Brady led a game-winning drive in the first one and threw for 354 yards and 3 TDs in the second one.

Belichick is an overrated cheater. He was 83-101 without Brady. That's a 184-game sample size without the GOAT. He sucked. Cleveland was a top franchise when Belichick got there. Made the playoffs five out of the six years prior to his arrival. He made them a loser. He went to New England and...