Search results

Just tells you the issue with us is getting the oline straight, getting horses in the backfield, and dynamic tes. In this system high end wrs are a luxury not necessity. I agree with the play calling being more creative but Georgia is built like a bro style offense. They have the horses...

Georgia has a massive oline, have decent rbs, and run multiple te sets. What they have is good play caller. Georgia’s system is very much in keeping with Mario’s philosophy imo

yeah, I know. But they are winning programs that will attract guys who want to get a ring no matter the position. And none of those have pass happy systems to begin with. Michigan is winning too. Yeah, I know Big 10 and all that. But their offense score over 40 points in the playoff and they...

why? If you are in a dynamic offense with rbs and tes getting touches then it's a matter of fitting in the system. Some of these guys just want to be the centerpiece and I guess that's ok but unless you are a Tyreek Hill that doesn't happen in the NFL either. I think once we start winning we...

Too many chiefs and not enough Indians can cause issues.

Not always that simple though. For example, Mario's last OC at Oregon goes to UNLV as head coach. If I am a player that got along with Arroyo and liked his system, I would still think twice about leaving a situation at Oregon and go to UNLV just to follow him. But then I find out Mario is...

nail on head

that's why committing to the head guy is what's important. I know if I go play for Paul Johnson what I am getting into.

Play caller and system though could mean two different things. I didn't necessarily mind a Michigan styled system. It certainly has worked for them and except for some mistakes could have been playing Georgia instead of TCU (and probably would have put up a better game). Play calling is...

negative recruiting? I think he's been dealing with that for a while so just comes with the territory. Ultimately, the numbers will tell the tale of how his offensive system fairs and how it develops guys for the league or not.

Then that is a Mario issue whether fair assessment or not. What does it matter who the OC is if they are running Mario's system? I do know this: running backs, tes, and oline seem to love it.

until he is no longer your position coach for the reasons I have outlined...then what?

I get that. I think though a kid that is committing just to be coached by a certain guy always risks the guy leaving at some point and being replaced, which usually happens if the guy is good at what he does (or gets fired if he isn't).

Just been thinking about this a little more and the fact we are not getting any outside wrs this cycle supposedly because our OC situation is in limbo. Are we making too big a deal of this? And are recruits making a mistake committing to position coaches and not so much the head guy? We know...