Search results

I don’t. If you’d more directly ask me what you’re getting to, I’ll be happy to answer. Being below average to average is considerably more than a talent issue. But, I think you know that and I’ve made my stances clear across the board since the beginning of the season.

To answer your last question, I’m almost exclusively now watching games for a group of players Miami has recruited the past two seasons. If we sneak out some wins, great. If we continue to lose, I pray it’s with guys like #31 and a few others getting 5x the snaps they’ve received per game so far.

Our competition.

While anything can happen, UNC is 2-0 in the ACC and has Duke/GT/Virginia as 3 of the 6 teams on their ACC schedule. We'd have to only drop 1 more game (Clemson) and they'd have to drop 3 games. They may very well drop games to Pitt, WF, and NCSt. But, I don't like our probabilities of running...

#6 (defense), #64, #90, #24 would all likely start on many decent teams. Bunch of young guys and really young guys we don't know that much about. I'd want #31 to get at least 50% of snaps for remainder of the season, for example.

I actually think the young guys - for example, the CBs - are likely to give up more plays (therefore, probably worse) than some of the others, but now that this season is likely shot, I think it's worth the squeeze. LBs, too. F it, man. My group pays decent money for basically two rows in the...

If that's what you took from the post, think you missed this one. Nothing to do with who (backups) I think are better players. Everything to do with taking Ls with young guys we hope develop over players we know aren't likely to develop much more (if at all).

We are what we are and that’s been relatively clear since Southern Miss: average to below average in almost all aspects. Can we make our now unlikely ‘run’ at the ACC coastal with more of Bissainthe, Chase Smith, Kelly, any new CBs (since they all get toasted or miscommunicate anyway)...