Search results

We weren't. But yes, another example of a great team surrounding a serviceable QB.

Tampa never won anything with Steve Young.

Granted, Rosier would never beat out those three above, but put him as the starter for Bama/Clemson/etc and he "wins" a ton of games.

Don't disagree. And the must get superstar QB reliance vs total organization building has crippled several franchises. The impacts are years long. For me, I just think its better for consistency to put in place OL/DL excellence, then add the missing piece (a variety of ways to do so) at QB/WR.

And those three organizations have been considered the "elite" in terms of coaching, roster management, salary cap, etc. Without question three HOF QBs above, but they were enabled by three of the best run, top to bottom, organizations. With Brady, are they even going to bother to vote?

I'm not sure **** on toast is a good thing. In Dilfer's defense, I believe he was a much better QB than credit has been given. When you watch discussions on the Raven's SB run, it's almost as if they speak of the win in spite of Dilfer's contributions. As for Steve Young, my point is the Bucs...

They are but two examples of many. With that said, the QB1 position is important--no question. I just feel there are more ways (and better risk/reward) than a team constantly shooting for their "superstar" QB. Team play makes a QB look better/worse far more than acknowledged. The market has...

The Steve Young Tampa Bay Buccaneers say hi. Also waving are the Trent Dilfer Baltimore Ravens.

It's a team effort. Yes, slingers are important, but the team succeeds/fails together.