Search results

Thank you for proving that you don't understand the topic.

No they're not. Look at Clemson's roster. Teams are picking four or five Florida kids to go with the 80 kids they get from other states.

Which college football teams have the most south Florida kids? I'll hang up and listen.

Florida kids aren't winning college football games. I don't care what they're doing up in Buford F'ing Georgia.

127 losses in 10 years. But Jeudy.

And I quote: "Who the fvck cares who the best players are on a losing team? "

But you've gone out of your way to point out south Florida players on this Miami team. Slow down, since you're getting confused.

So you agree that we need better players. That's all you had to say. By the way, I haven't said one personal thing about you. But you're really showing your character in this thread. Thank goodness you're coaching young people.

Now that he has better players, shouldn't that result in 10-11 wins per year? I mean, he has better players now.

Now has 80% Florida kids and can't beat Duke.

So you just argued for seven pages and now you finally admit that our south Florida players aren't championship-caliber players? That could have saved a whole bunch of insults.

Richt had a roster full of Georgia kids and won 9.66 games per year. Now Richt has a roster full of south Florida kids and can't beat Duke. Do you know what a variable is?

How about the gutsiest guy in the last decade to play here: Berrios. Then watch f'ing Dee Wiggins try to make a tough catch.

You mean back when the Florida P5 teams were good? Thanks for making my point. How is Georgia doing against Florida today? ****, how is Missouri and Kentucky doing against Florida today? (Please, please tell me about the quality coaching at Missouri and Kentucky and Duke and Tulane).

That's awesome. And it has nothing to do with what is being said here. Being fast and playing streetball might get you some wins against freaking Buford. This is a different level.

Miami, FSU, and Florida = hundreds of south Florida players over the years = 127 losses in a decade. The response? "Jeudy is playing well at Alabama!!!" Well, then, that settles it.

You just don't understand CFB stats. Playing f'ing Virginia, Duke, and UNC isn't the same as playing in the B12. Nice, we have the #1 defense. Now if we could only win games.

Anecdotal. Good god. We have dozens and dozens of SF players every single year and we continue to lose games to bad teams.

Precisely. We're at a disadvantage from the start.

Our defense isn't exactly playing Texas Tech and Arizona State every week. Boston College did just about whatever they wanted.