Search results

And why is being at a program for 15 years before here a crutch and not an advantage over someone who had never been a head coach before? How is that a disadvantage? That's such a stupid thought

If you want to use somebody that has had success in college before taking over than lets use Harbaugh. How many times do you see guys commit to Michigan and then back off their pledge? Not many. He has no national titles as a coach, no super bowl rings, so he's not on Saban level and even Richt...

I guess you never went to school since you don't know how to read. What i am saying and have been saying the entire time is we need to have a different recruiting strategy bcuz we get played way too often. Dabo has kept the same recruiting strategy his entire time of being a Head Coach. Do not...

Dabo was learning on the job and still didnt let recruits decommit on him and play him. Richt has been doing this for 18 years and it has happened more in this year alone the Dabos entire tenure. Thank you for making my point

Lol yea I'm comparing an 18 yr HC who gets played still to a HC who has had the same recruiting approach since he started there. Who's the better recruiter? Richt has the staff that he wants so talking about Coordinators is a null point. Blake James has shelled out the money to not only get this...

How do you explain the stretch that Clemson had from 2011-2014 where they had 1 season where they lost 1 game. Every other season was 2-4 losses. They had this same recruiting theory. Do not commit to us unless you are truly committed and will stop taking visits? They've had 2 decommittments...

This is my thinking, yes. I just used silents as an example since it's fresh to us now.

It's not "Win and the recruits will come." It's "Get the recruits and then you will win." Saban didnt take over a powerhouse team, he made them a powerhouse. Dabo same thing. Notre Dame was having down years before and during Brian Kellys reign and they get recruits still. LSU have had down...

All the teams that get brought up as examples all do the same thing I am saying to do. If you want to stay silent and take visits, we will continue to recruit players. Its why Ingraham is a new commit lol

Well if you read the paragraph of info, you would have seen that I said if Ingraham continues to take visits, you continue to recruit in case Ingraham does what he did. That way, you aren't just starting on kid, you would have already had a relationship with the kid

Bcuz it's not real is my whole point! They get told they are committed but are gonna keep it quite. They hold onto the spot and then stop recruiting other players because of it. They go to the media and say "we have silent commits". Fans take that and get confident and then the sky is falling...

Too many times it never works out. Programs like Clemson and LSU don't take silents and some don't even let commits visits, threatening to pull offers because of it. These kids nowadays tell staffs they are committing to keep a spot and wait for the big time offer they want and then switch. Idk...