Search results

The article it came from said it was from the kids that were signed... I guess I took that to mean soemething different. Either way, we ain’t there yet and I don’t think we are getting there until next year. If we are closer to 40% I don’t even think a heisman season bridges the gap on that...

I didn’t do it based on total 85 available scholarships. I did it vs total signed on the roster.

Yes at work. Upload it Monday, chief

I get it. We won nattys in the 80s and early 90s probably without a positive ratio. The game was different back then, especially the fact that you could have more kids on scholarship. The fact still stands that in the last 15 years, no team has won a national title without hitting the blue chip...

That's why I included the "We aren't winning a national title unless we have a Heisman caliber season" line. If one of our QBs or RBs decides to have a nationally relevant year, we could compete with what we have.

I believe in the Blue Chip Ratio theory, mostly because it’s been proven as a strong indicator of rosters capable of winning a national title based on roster make up. Okay, so good news and bad news. The bad news is based on our current roster, we are not going to win a national championship in...