The Work 12-4

The Work 12-4

Peter Ariz
Peter Ariz

Comments (157)

I'm not gonna blast Lane or any other recruit but why the nastiness towards UM now? You've been a supposed fan your entire life and now blast your favorite team. If he wants to go to UF that's fine its his decision and if he feels that's his best opportunity then so be it.

Or is this Quincy being influencial on him?
It might have to do with Miami not being in contact with him for long stretches. Which is the same reason Quincy is ****ed at Miami. You grow up a fan of a school and they dont show a ton of interest while schools all over the country are blowing up your phone is starts to wear on you.

do you really believe miami has not been in contact with him for long stretches when his freakin uncle is coach barrow?
 
I'm not gonna blast Lane or any other recruit but why the nastiness towards UM now? You've been a supposed fan your entire life and now blast your favorite team. If he wants to go to UF that's fine its his decision and if he feels that's his best opportunity then so be it.

Or is this Quincy being influencial on him?
It might have to do with Miami not being in contact with him for long stretches. Which is the same reason Quincy is ****ed at Miami. You grow up a fan of a school and they dont show a ton of interest while schools all over the country are blowing up your phone is starts to wear on you.

do you really believe miami has not been in contact with him for long stretches when his freakin uncle is coach barrow?

Barrow is not his uncle, and yes Miami had not talked to Lane in a couple months before they've picked it up recently
 
LSU was at STA today
 
Advertisement
when LSU brings their crew to south florida, we should immediately jump in a plane to Louisiana and start in-homing their commits. i'm tired of these ***** taking our studs.
 
Of course LSU is going to go to STA. It's not like South Florida is a secret, and STA is a huge factory. If you are going to be elite, you have to have a presence at all these schools. Let's not panic.
 
Advertisement
Free Pawn, I was moreso speaking to the overall number of 85. We could be pushing a class of **** near 35 if certain dominoes fall our way. (meaning Cook, JC, Hester, Pelon, Johnson, Dixon AND Lane want in.) Thats 35 commits! Where are we getting all this room from? (this number doesnt include Lockley or Griffin mind you.) I am not an expert in this subject but if Al can make it work im all for it.

We aren´t. This year´s limit is 29. We cannot sign more than that. We have 28 commits, we have room for 1 more. If we want to sign other players like the ones you mention, attrition will have to come from those committed players, not from players already on the team.

Once again, unlike last year, the 85 limit has nothing to do with our class size this year. What´s limiting class size this time around is the 25 scholly per cycle limit that the NCAA imposes. The only way to exceed that is to sign a smaller class the year before (we signed 21). Then, you can "fill up" that previous year´s class. But only with EEs, and only by as many as you were under the limit.

An example: we signed 21 players last season. So if we were to have, say, 11 EEs this time around, 4 of them could be counted as class of 2013 players, the rest as 2014 players. Thus allowing us to sign this years 25 plus 4. More than that is impossible, even if Golden were to cull the roster to just 40 players, the NCAA does not allow you to enroll more than 25 per cycle.
 
Last edited:
Free Pawn, I was moreso speaking to the overall number of 85. We could be pushing a class of **** near 35 if certain dominoes fall our way. (meaning Cook, JC, Hester, Pelon, Johnson, Dixon AND Lane want in.) Thats 35 commits! Where are we getting all this room from? (this number doesnt include Lockley or Griffin mind you.) I am not an expert in this subject but if Al can make it work im all for it.

We aren´t. This year´s limit is 29. We cannot sign more than that. We have 28 commits, we have room for 1 more. If we want to sign other players like the ones you mention, attrition will have to come from those committed players, not from players already on the team.

Once again, unlike last year, the 85 limit has nothing to do with our class size this year. What´s limiting class size this time around is the 25 scholly per cycle limit that the NCAA imposes. The only way to exceed that is to sign a smaller class the year before (we signed 21). Then, you can "fill up" that previous year´s class. But only with EEs, and only by as many as you were under the limit.

An example: we signed 21 players last season. So if we were to have, say, 11 EEs this time around, 4 of them could be counted as class of 2013 players, the rest as 2014 players. Thus allowing us to sign this years 25 plus 4. More than that is impossible, even if Golden were to cull the roster to just 40 players, the NCAA does not allow you to enroll more than 25 per cycle.

HOW ARE WE STILL HAVING THIS SAME OLD TIRED ARGUMENT?

Golden may be lacking in some areas, but roster management is one of them. He will sign however many he deems alright and will make it work one way or the other. Some guys will decommit, some current guys will not be here next year, etc. Why bother arguing?
 
Free Pawn, I was moreso speaking to the overall number of 85. We could be pushing a class of **** near 35 if certain dominoes fall our way. (meaning Cook, JC, Hester, Pelon, Johnson, Dixon AND Lane want in.) Thats 35 commits! Where are we getting all this room from? (this number doesnt include Lockley or Griffin mind you.) I am not an expert in this subject but if Al can make it work im all for it.

We aren´t. This year´s limit is 29. We cannot sign more than that. We have 28 commits, we have room for 1 more. If we want to sign other players like the ones you mention, attrition will have to come from those committed players, not from players already on the team.

Once again, unlike last year, the 85 limit has nothing to do with our class size this year. What´s limiting class size this time around is the 25 scholly per cycle limit that the NCAA imposes. The only way to exceed that is to sign a smaller class the year before (we signed 21). Then, you can "fill up" that previous year´s class. But only with EEs, and only by as many as you were under the limit.

An example: we signed 21 players last season. So if we were to have, say, 11 EEs this time around, 4 of them could be counted as class of 2013 players, the rest as 2014 players. Thus allowing us to sign this years 25 plus 4. More than that is impossible, even if Golden were to cull the roster to just 40 players, the NCAA does not allow you to enroll more than 25 per cycle.

HOW ARE WE STILL HAVING THIS SAME OLD TIRED ARGUMENT?

Golden may be lacking in some areas, but roster management is one of them. He will sign however many he deems alright and will make it work one way or the other. Some guys will decommit, some current guys will not be here next year, etc. Why bother arguing?

The bolded part of your post is totally irrelevant to this years class size. Pls read the post you quoted if you want to understand why.
 
Free Pawn, I was moreso speaking to the overall number of 85. We could be pushing a class of **** near 35 if certain dominoes fall our way. (meaning Cook, JC, Hester, Pelon, Johnson, Dixon AND Lane want in.) Thats 35 commits! Where are we getting all this room from? (this number doesnt include Lockley or Griffin mind you.) I am not an expert in this subject but if Al can make it work im all for it.

We aren´t. This year´s limit is 29. We cannot sign more than that. We have 28 commits, we have room for 1 more. If we want to sign other players like the ones you mention, attrition will have to come from those committed players, not from players already on the team.

Once again, unlike last year, the 85 limit has nothing to do with our class size this year. What´s limiting class size this time around is the 25 scholly per cycle limit that the NCAA imposes. The only way to exceed that is to sign a smaller class the year before (we signed 21). Then, you can "fill up" that previous year´s class. But only with EEs, and only by as many as you were under the limit.

An example: we signed 21 players last season. So if we were to have, say, 11 EEs this time around, 4 of them could be counted as class of 2013 players, the rest as 2014 players. Thus allowing us to sign this years 25 plus 4. More than that is impossible, even if Golden were to cull the roster to just 40 players, the NCAA does not allow you to enroll more than 25 per cycle.

Hope your 28 commits includes Cook. His offer is binding on the U until he formally elects to go elsewhere
 
Advertisement
Of course LSU is going to go to STA. It's not like South Florida is a secret, and STA is a huge factory. If you are going to be elite, you have to have a presence at all these schools. Let's not panic.

well in that case lets take our business to edna karr, st augustine, and john curtis
 
when LSU brings their crew to south florida, we should immediately jump in a plane to Louisiana and start in-homing their commits. i'm tired of these ****s taking our studs.

Im down with this. The problem is, if there is one place in America more corrupt than South Florida, its the state of Louisiana. Which means LSU pretty much gets away with WHATEVER they want in LA. I mean its worse than Bama. New Orleans is the most corrupt city in America. The problem isnt that we wont go recruit in Louisiana, its that we cant pay what L$U does nor get away with what they do. The entire state of Louisiana is complicit in what LSU does, just like the State of Alabama is complicit in what Bama gets away with, and Auburn to a lesser extent. SEC territory is like another planet.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top