Mike Lombardi, former Raiders executive and new North Carolina GM, takes shot at Mario Cristobal

Trinton Breeze
1 min read

Comments (331)

Why do these MFs always get put on PAID administrative leave? F that. Furlough his *** and pay him later if required.

I’m not an HR flunky and don’t need HR terms thrown at me. F this guy.
The liberal federal law almost forces this unless you catch him on video doing the bad act. Carry on
Almost.

I get what you’re saying and certainly not looking to play wordsmith or Loco Lawyer. I’m not an HR person either. I also understand why those positions exist and that there are employment contracts that I haven’t read. I have been a party to a workplace lawsuit and I’ve seen a few others in my time. It’s no bueno. All that to the side, I find it incredibly counterintuitive that an employee who is pre-terminated (being investigated) is paid after being essentially let go for misdeeds.

Yes I’m aware of most/all the holes in the commentary I laid out. And I’m sure I missed a pause in there too. To quote you, carry on.
 
Multiple threads about him. You’re wrong. CIS thinks about him all the time.

Obviously now there is, but you’re acting like there’s innate knowledge of his relation to Vince Lombardi lol. No one cares
 
Last edited:
Why do these MFs always get put on PAID administrative leave? F that. Furlough his *** and pay him later if required.

I’m not an HR flunky and don’t need HR terms thrown at me. F this guy.
Damages >>>> paid administrative leave. Considering this is state-funded, they go with the cheapest option.

If you fire or suspend someone and it came out that it was without probable cause, you're in for a payment that'll hurt future generations. And that's not HR talk... but I can do that for you too if you want to get really mad.
 
But.... why is no one??? That's the part I'm missing.
It's AI. Unless you're into fabricated sandwiches that don't actually exist, you can bite all you want to.
 
Why do these MFs always get put on PAID administrative leave? F that. Furlough his *** and pay him later if required.

I’m not an HR flunky and don’t need HR terms thrown at me. F this guy.
Damages >>>> paid administrative leave. Considering this is state-funded, they go with the cheapest option.

If you fire or suspend someone and it came out that it was without probable cause, you're in for a payment that'll hurt future generations. And that's not HR talk... but I can do that for you too if you want to get really mad.
I’m good on the HR talk - thanks 😂 . I understand the concept of mitigating damages. Settling out of court is almost always a better (financially) option. At its most basic level, I find the concept of paying a soon-to-be-terminated employee ridiculous. I also recognize the other components as to why things go like they do. 🤷🏼‍♂️
 
It's AI. Unless you're into fabricated sandwiches that don't actually exist, you can bite all you want to.
Ahh, my dumb *** thought that was real. Well, if I was AI.....
 
I’m good on the HR talk - thanks 😂 . I understand the concept of mitigating damages. Settling out of court is almost always a better (financially) option. At its most basic level, I find the concept of paying a soon-to-be-terminated employee ridiculous. I also recognize the other components as to why things go like they do. 🤷🏼‍♂️
I've seen someone receive his notification of being let go (technically wasn't a firing, it was a mutual agreement to leave, with payment) without the signature of the head personnel executive and no authorization from said executive that someone else can sign the document and hand it over.

Company paid an extra five-digit sum because the release was deemed inadmissable in court. Concept may be ridiculous, but law that protects workers isn't bad if everyone follows it.
 
I’m good on the HR talk - thanks 😂 . I understand the concept of mitigating damages. Settling out of court is almost always a better (financially) option. At its most basic level, I find the concept of paying a soon-to-be-terminated employee ridiculous. I also recognize the other components as to why things go like they do. 🤷🏼‍♂️
I've seen someone receive his notification of being let go (technically wasn't a firing, it was a mutual agreement to leave, with payment) without the signature of the head personnel executive and no authorization from said executive that someone else can sign the document and hand it over.

Company paid an extra five-digit sum because the release was deemed inadmissable in court. Concept may be ridiculous, but law that protects workers isn't bad if everyone follows it.
This is why I’m in business without employees and not a lawyer.

And yes, I comprehend everything you wrote. I’m also a firm believer in working things out whenever possible without the “help” of attorneys. And that’s not a lawyer bash; simply a statement of truth based on my experiences in life. And yes, this is getting off topic. And I’ve started 4 sentences with the word “and” which would certainly **** off an old English teacher in a similar way that I feel annoyed that Mike Lombardi is on PAID admin leave. Back on topic.
 
This is why I’m in business without employees and not a lawyer.

And yes, I comprehend everything you wrote. I’m also a firm believer in working things out whenever possible without the “help” of attorneys. And that’s not a lawyer bash; simply a statement of truth based on my experiences in life. And yes, this is getting off topic. And I’ve started 4 sentences with the word “and” which would certainly **** off an old English teacher in a similar way that I feel annoyed that Mike Lombardi is on PAID admin leave. Back on topic.
The Weeknd Snl GIF by Saturday Night Live
 
Obviously now there is, but you’re acting like there’s innate knowledge of his relation to Vince Lombardi lol. No one cares
He has no relation to Vince. And the owner of CIS was on Twitter calling him out. CIS cares, a lot
 
Almost.

I get what you’re saying and certainly not looking to play wordsmith or Loco Lawyer. I’m not an HR person either. I also understand why those positions exist and that there are employment contracts that I haven’t read. I have been a party to a workplace lawsuit and I’ve seen a few others in my time. It’s no bueno. All that to the side, I find it incredibly counterintuitive that an employee who is pre-terminated (being investigated) is paid after being essentially let go for misdeeds.

Yes I’m aware of most/all the holes in the commentary I laid out. And I’m sure I missed a pause in there too. To quote you, carry on.
As a business owner, I HATE IT TOO! But, when we terminate people we pay them a "fair" severance to buy peace. Welcome to litigation USA!
 
Back
Top