Miami Mentions: 2020 Top247 July Update

Miami Mentions: 2020 Top247 July Update

Stefan Adams

Comments (143)

So, let me see if I understand yet another one of your genius conclusions.

Kids who have NOT YET ATTENDED Alabama, UGa, LSU, and Clemson...kids in high school...get inflated rankings...NOT from camps...but because of the reputations of coaches who have not yet even coached the kids...

So, not only does this go against your "it's all about the camps, man" argument, it also indicates exactly what Miami fans have complained about for 20 years, that there are bias factors in play.

And, of course, ignoring the fact that Alabama, UGa, LSU, and Clemson have very large, and very active, websites in 247/Rivals.

How many posts are you going to make where you deny the obvious?
If the coaches r targeting them and everyone knows the typical bag schools UGA Bama etc are in the running Im sure those guys move up based on those schools showing super high interest. Or are u going to be Austinecane and follow anything that I say that can be looked at with multiple glasses? Like we all agreed on the bias of Miami hate is the only thing I disagree with, school bias based on monster head coaches? that I believe
 
You still don't ******* get it.

I'm not even saying that I agree with it, but what the HISTORICAL criticism has been goes like this - once a kid CHOOSES Miami, he stays the same, or drops, in the rankings. Kids who pick Alabama or other SEC schools, once they CHOOSE, will go UP in the rankings.

So keep yammering on about camps and whatnot, you are clueless as to what people have complained about for 20 years.

And as further proof that you are clueless, go to the point about Knighton/Williams going UP in the rankings after NOT participating in camps, and Walker going DOWN in the rankings after doing well in camps.

Stop acting as if camps determine these rankings. We all know that certain writers from certain websites lobby the **** out of 247 to "bump" their particular recruits up in the rankings.
So no kid ever whos chose Miami has ever raised in there ranking? ever of all time has it ever happened? I dont remember who raises after commits so I wouldnt know but if someone here can prove that then they and u have a point.
 
D - your statements are sad to say the least!!!
This is one thing thats hard for me to believe bruh, its real hard for me to believe. I get these so called experts arent the end all be all of prospects but usually the number 1 player is the number one player doesnt matter what school they go to. Clowney would of been ranked 1 no matter if he was from Indonesia or if he was coming here. **** DJ Williams was 1 regardless
 
Next cycle for me at least James Williams is a 5 star he has those measureables
 
I get that Brevin isn't going to be a 1st round pick. I don't think he's got the size or elite speed. However, it was impossible to know that 3 years ago. Brevin would've been bumped if he went elsewhere and I'm sticking to it. He was the number 1 TE on some sites.
The number 1 TE on Rivals went to Georgia, and he didn’t get a 5th star either. Not sure how much more clear it can be. Maybe our kids get underrated. Brevin wasn’t a compelling example of that.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
The number 1 TE on Rivals went to Georgoa, and he didn’t get a 5th star either. Not sure how much more clear it can be. Maybe our kids get underrated. Brevin wasn’t a compelling example of that.
5 star should be special players that have a high chance at being a first rounder
 
He was a four star because he had elite measeruables for a QB and looked great in camps. When the lights came on he sucked, and the rankings reflected that.
I disagree he looked great. His form and throwing motion looked awkward. Long slimg. Powerful arm but not quick release, and not fluid motion. IMO he got rated based on punt pass and kick metrics. Tall, looked the past, strong arm, could run. But on film, I do not think he looked good, even in camps. IMO.
 
everybody in this board knows that to win a championship you need to have the right ratio of blue chippers. so they drop our recruits to make us a team full of 3 stars, makes sure we can't win another championship.
 
Advertisement
People are confusing the issues around rankings.

It is true that all else being equal, a kid committed to Miami who isn’t in play for other programs will get somewhat underrated, particularly at the top end of the rankings. There is an obvious reason for this. The various regional guys have to fight over who gets the top spots. Their bread is buttered by bigger fan bases. There is no reason for them to fight for a kid committed to UM. Why bother.

That said, Pope was a 5*. So was Lingard. And they were relatively early commits. They had the measurables, proved it on the camp circuit, and Richt commanded respect. That last point is lost in this discussion. When a coach had cred, his kids get more benefit of the doubt. Manny isn’t proven yet as an evaluator or recruiter. That plays in here too. [More reason to dismiss the Jordan shoulda been a 5* theory - we got two 5* kids in that very class.]

5* kids are ultimately kids Alabama would like to sign. Kids the top recruiting schools all want. OSU, UGA, Clemson. Kids who are generally prototypes, high ceilings, NFL futures.

None of this should matter to us. If we evaluate well, we will be fine. If we win, and start sending more kids in the top 2 rounds of the draft, our kids will get rated higher. Ater 17 years of mediocrity, we should not be whining about Rivals.
 
People are confusing the issues around rankings.

It is true that all else being equal, a kid committed to Miami who isn’t in play for other programs will get somewhat underrated, particularly at the top end of the rankings. There is an obvious reason for this. The various regional guys have to fight over who gets the top spots. Their bread is buttered by bigger fan bases. There is no reason for them to fight for a kid committed to UM. Why bother.

That said, Pope was a 5*. So was Lingard. And they were relatively early commits. They had the measurables, proved it on the camp circuit, and Richt commanded respect. That last point is lost in this discussion. When a coach had cred, his kids get more benefit of the doubt. Manny isn’t proven yet as an evaluator or recruiter. That plays in here too. [More reason to dismiss the Jordan shoulda been a 5* theory - we got two 5* kids in that very class.]

5* kids are ultimately kids Alabama would like to sign. Kids the top recruiting schools all want. OSU, UGA, Clemson. Kids who are generally prototypes, high ceilings, NFL futures.

None of this should matter to us. If we evaluate well, we will be fine. If we win, and start sending more kids in the top 2 rounds of the draft, our kids will get rated higher. Ater 17 years of mediocrity, we should not be whining about Rivals.
This is basically what Im saying about coaching record and cred this is exactly what I mean, agree on kids getting rated higher if Diaz's evals are on point. 17 years of hot garbage I wouldnt rate anything that high on us unless its guys like u mentioned Pope etc.
 
I wasnt on the web enough then to follow recruiting but I was going off a site that had Sean Taylor a 5 star im not sure the site name Im sure it was posted here or scout


Sean Taylor was never, never-ever, a 5-star. We can argue whether he SHOULD HAVE been a 5-star, but he was not a 5-star under ANY SERVICE that was in existence back then. Which was Rivals and Scout. Period. End of discussion.

Don't rely on your faulty memory.

Rivals currently is showing rankings back to 2002. Sean Taylor signed in 2001.

Or read his bio from UM's media guide:

HIGH SCHOOL: Gulliver Prep... the No. 7 prospect in Dade County by the Miami Herald... rated the nation's No. 18 skill athlete by SuperPrep... a SuperPrep All-American... the No. 23 overall prospect in Florida, regardless of position, by SuperPrep... an Orlando Sentinel Super Southern Team selection... listed as the No. 1 athlete on the Florida Times-Union Super 75 list... the No. 14 player in Florida by the Gainesville Sun... accounted for three touchdowns (two receiving, one rushing) in the state title game victory over Marianna... a teammate of Gulliver Prep quarterback and fellow UM signee Buck Ortega... helped lead Gulliver to the Florida Class 2A State Championship in 2000... was a star on both sides of the ball in 2000, Taylor rushed for 1,300 yards and a state-record 44 touchdowns... played running back, defensive back and linebacker at Gulliver... rushed for more than 200 yards twice during Gulliver's state playoff run... racked up more than 100 tackles during the 2000 season... displayed excellent hands as a receiver... coached by Steve Howie at Gulliver Academy.



And while all that stuff sounds great, it is DEFINITELY NOT 5-star. There are 49 other states, and Sean Taylor was not even listed in the Top 5 in Dade or the Top 5 in Florida.

We can argue coulda/woulda/shoulda, but Sean Taylor was NOT a 5-star at the time.
 
So no kid ever whos chose Miami has ever raised in there ranking? ever of all time has it ever happened? I dont remember who raises after commits so I wouldnt know but if someone here can prove that then they and u have a point.


Stop arguing 20 years of history with a "no kid ever" type of challenge.

You are wrong. You are. Go read THE ENTIRE Gaytor Tears thread. The UF writers/moderators CONSTANTLY lobby Rivals and 247 to "bump up" the Gaytor recruits. We have screen shots.

Nobody is saying that IN TWENTY YEARS not one single solitary UM COMMIT has EVER gone up. A few have. What people are ACCURATELY arguing is that Miami COMMITS, kids who choose Miami well before National Signing Day, tend to get bumped downward.

Now, you can go and svck Wilfong's dong and claim that "nobody is biased against Miami" and that Wiltfong is "only giving bumps to 10 other kids", but the outcome is the same. SEC writers/moderators lobby Wiltfong to "bump up" their recruits, and Miami writers/moderators do not do the same thing, thus our COMMITS are constantly leap-frogged by SEC recruits.

It's been happening for 20 years. People have been observing it for 20 years. Yet you come here to tell us that our eyes and our memories deceive us.

Go away.
 
Advertisement
Sean Taylor was never, never-ever, a 5-star. We can argue whether he SHOULD HAVE been a 5-star, but he was not a 5-star under ANY SERVICE that was in existence back then. Which was Rivals and Scout. Period. End of discussion.

Don't rely on your faulty memory.

Rivals currently is showing rankings back to 2002. Sean Taylor signed in 2001.

Or read his bio from UM's media guide:

HIGH SCHOOL: Gulliver Prep... the No. 7 prospect in Dade County by the Miami Herald... rated the nation's No. 18 skill athlete by SuperPrep... a SuperPrep All-American... the No. 23 overall prospect in Florida, regardless of position, by SuperPrep... an Orlando Sentinel Super Southern Team selection... listed as the No. 1 athlete on the Florida Times-Union Super 75 list... the No. 14 player in Florida by the Gainesville Sun... accounted for three touchdowns (two receiving, one rushing) in the state title game victory over Marianna... a teammate of Gulliver Prep quarterback and fellow UM signee Buck Ortega... helped lead Gulliver to the Florida Class 2A State Championship in 2000... was a star on both sides of the ball in 2000, Taylor rushed for 1,300 yards and a state-record 44 touchdowns... played running back, defensive back and linebacker at Gulliver... rushed for more than 200 yards twice during Gulliver's state playoff run... racked up more than 100 tackles during the 2000 season... displayed excellent hands as a receiver... coached by Steve Howie at Gulliver Academy.



And while all that stuff sounds great, it is DEFINITELY NOT 5-star. There are 49 other states, and Sean Taylor was not even listed in the Top 5 in Dade or the Top 5 in Florida.

We can argue coulda/woulda/shoulda, but Sean Taylor was NOT a 5-star at the time.
I forgot what the site was called I will bullshyt u not the main sites or magazines then didnt have him as a five star but most people knew he was elite. I forgot the site man fuq I used to use it and brought it up a few time early in this sites cycle. If u scroll up at what ethnicsands is saying thats pretty much how I look at it virtually me and him have the same thought process. None of us have official proof on what these sites go by but Im sure coaching pedigree has alot to do with it or its one of the numerous things that have to do with it.
 
This is basically what Im saying about coaching record and cred this is exactly what I mean, agree on kids getting rated higher if Diaz's evals are on point. 17 years of hot garbage I wouldnt rate anything that high on us unless its guys like u mentioned Pope etc.
So Pope's a clear 5 star and not Brevin? You guys crack me up. Pope was a 170lbs soaking wet. What stood out to me was the AA game. He had multiple chances to shine and did nada. He got beat on 50/50 balls by an Oky commit that wasn't a take for UM. Pope didn't explode on the scene like Coley or Richards as a frosh. He was rated higher than them both. Pope was beat out by Lawrence Cager and Dee Wiggins. Pope's got a TON to prove.
 
Advertisement
It’s about the size of the fan bases that pay for subscriptions. UM’s fan base that would pay for football board subscriptions is nowhere near the size of the big public schools. They want to make the people that pay the bills happy. It’s certainly politics.

This is it. At the end of the day rivals and 247 are in the business of making money. They want the large subscription bases logging in checking where their guys are ranked and looking at all those shiny stars.
 
So no kid ever whos chose Miami has ever raised in there ranking? ever of all time has it ever happened? I dont remember who raises after commits so I wouldnt know but if someone here can prove that then they and u have a point.

Every time Ive seen a Miami player get a major bump, they counter it by dropping the rest of the class. Lol When Duke was finally given his 5th on the very last update a bunch of our other guys dropped.
 
Back
Top