Diaz on Odenigbo, Ford, and defending AJ Dillon

Diaz on Odenigbo, Ford, and defending AJ Dillon

Stefan Adams

Comments (29)

I wouldn’t mind a HC in waiting title added to his name honestly. He is the Miami attitude but he’s also a super smart guy.
 
So your reaction was for Tito to not have PT..how about g will who caused it..lmao at F OFF..yup that was my reaction. Two bonehead plays
Dude it’s pretty telling half way through the season you’re biggest play may have been the worst penalty I’ve ever seen in any level of football
 
The scary thing about all of this is Richt thinks execution is the problem with the offense. He really can’t be that ancient can he?
 
Advertisement
This might not be a popular move but I'd like to see Willis play some DE on Friday.

DE: Jackson, Willis, Garvin, Patchan
DT: Bethel, Tito, Ford, Silvera

NO! You keep our most disruptive DT at DT.
 
My guess is that we will stack the box (8 leaving corners on an island) and play aggressive like we always do. We will get TFL (I would guess double digits) but we will also allow some long plays in return. Defense will probably give up about 17 to 20 points so we better hope that the O brings it this week. Guess we will see.
 
The scary thing about all of this is Richt thinks execution is the problem with the offense. He really can’t be that ancient can he?

Considering his offense probably a good fit in the 1940,s and maybe early 50,a I would say pretty ancient
 
This might not be a popular move but I'd like to see Willis play some DE on Friday.

DE: Jackson, Willis, Garvin, Patchan
DT: Bethel, Tito, Ford, Silvera
Against a strong running team like BC I'd like to see us run a 5-2 alignment. J.Jackson, Willis, Bethel, D. Jackson, and Garvin. We can rotate the linebackers to keep them fresh and blitz some of our db's on select, obvious run situations.
 
Advertisement
The scary thing about all of this is Richt thinks execution is the problem with the offense. He really can’t be that ancient can he?
You heard it before instead of its a process it's execution instead.
 
Back
Top