forums

wisconsin and b10 are full of ****

haven't heard of any lawsuit filings yet, so smoke blowing?
 
I don’t know anything about how lawsuits work. I don’t know what jurisdiction this lawsuit would fall under. But lawyers and judges all eat at the same steakhouses and go to the same country clubs.
Wisconsin could just be trying to find a way or a venue or a judge that would be more open to the Wisconsin angle? Again, don’t laugh at me if I’m way off on this.
But it seems like you make a statement like you’re the big bad wolf and the right one in the argument and then take forever to actually take legal action.
 
TheOriginalCane said:
I'd imagine this is also "power-oriented". Like, do we honestly believe that Northwestern can force this deal on their players?

I'd imagine that Michigan, Pedo State, Ohio Taint, and Wisconsin (one of the most powerful universities on the planet, in their opinion) would be pulling this high-handed ****.
Click to expand...
Browsing their site, I could not believe the amount of times I saw this or a similar statement. It was really odd
 
Hoyacane1620 said:



I didn't know where to put this but it seemed appropriate to go here....
Click to expand...


Hey remember no transferring within the state, or in conference, well let’s add hometown university into that mix as well for good measure; even though that used to be the easiest case for hardship granted to eliminate the sit-out year.

This won’t end well for the first brave mfs to try it. Barriers to entry and exit….13.1.1.4.1. Is so broad as to be unenforceable and unfeasible unless it’s direct contact between tampering school staff member and player.

How hilariously fitting that Wisconsin concealed their violation of their obligation, whined their way into a new rule blaming Tulane and UMiami instead of Duke & Wisconsin themselves, and now have legalized their improper conduct while additionally regulating away freedom of movement for student-athletes.
 
Back
Top