Why Private Schools Have a Disadvantage in College Baseball

brcane1

Sophomore
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
2,440
http://dailytrojan.com/2014/01/22/baseball-program-needs-to-improve/

Baseball program needs to improve

By Nick Burton · Daily Trojan

Posted January 22, 2014 (2 days ago) at 11:54 pm in Columns, Sports

A little less than a year ago, I wrote a feature piece examining the plight of private schools — USC specifically — in college baseball. That plight is this: an NCAA Division I baseball team is allotted 11.7 scholarships to allocate amongst 27 players. If divided equally, that’s a little less than half of a scholarship per player, leaving the remaining half of tuition to be paid out of pocket. At a public school such at Cal State Fullerton or UCLA, that’s $5,500 or $16,000, respectively. At a private school, such as USC, that skyrockets to more than $22,000.

Put yourself in the position of a recruit. USC baseball coach Dan Hubbs says his program can offer you a half scholarship to play for him. Pretty sweet, right? You’re getting some $90,000 in free education over four years. But your family will also have to pay that same amount out of their own pocket. Across town, UCLA baseball coach John Savage is also offering you a half scholarship to play for him. Now all of the sudden your family will “only” be asked for around $65,000.

Or, think about it this way: your family can afford $25,000 a year for school. To play at USC you would require more than half of a scholarship. At Cal State Fullerton, that’s the entire cost of attendance out of pocket, freeing up that half scholarship for someone else.

And so the question begs: is it possible for USC to be a national power in baseball anymore? Why would the average recruit choose to pay $90,000 for college when he could pay half that?

As I approached various members of the baseball staff and the athletic department about the story — from then-head coach Frank Cruz to athletic director Pat Haden — I was met with some resistance. It would be hard for them to talk about this and not sound like they were trying to make excuses.

In fact, that’s exactly what an online commenter called the story, “Nothing but excuses.” When you’re talking about the single most successful program in the history of the sport (USC baseball’s 12 national championships are the most all-time by double over Texas’ six), it’s hard to call it anything else. Plus, there are quite a few private schools around the country (Stanford, Rice, Vanderbilt) that are constantly among the top tier of college baseball teams, something that cannot be said about USC for at least the last decade.

There are many reasons those schools have been more successful than USC, not the least of which is their respective endowments, which per student range from double to more than 10 times that of USC. And yet, their performance has slowed in recent years too.

“Of all of the sports in college athletics, statistics show that baseball is the most difficult one for private schools to be consistently competitive in on a championship level,” Haden told me for that story a year ago.

As Haden said, the numbers back that up. Rice was the last private school to win a College World Series, back in 2003. In the 10 series since then, private schools have made the CWS a total of 11 times, including just twice in the last five years. The last time more than one private school made it was 2008, when Stanford, Rice and Miami all made their way to Omaha. None have been back since.

Yet, while the performance of those schools may not be what it once was, none have experienced the headfirst plunge in both success and national relevance that USC has over the last decade. Scholarship limitations do prevent the Trojans from being the superpower they once were, but those limitations alone don’t cause the program to suffer as it has. There is absolutely no reason they should continue to.
 
Advertisement
There's a definitely a disadvantage. Even in tennis, men's teams are allowed 4.5 scholarships while the women are given eight. At Miami, They have to split and dice up the scholarships where some of the players are not even getting a fourth of their tuition paid for. That being said, USC just finished four consecutive national championships ('09-'12) so it can be done but it's not easy. Seeing how far the men's tennis program has fallen at Miami, I often wonder if there is a chance to come back. All the top Florida recruits have been going elsewhere. It's depressing just thinking about it.
 
Another point not mentioned is that many state schools, particularly in the southeast, now also offer academic scholarships for students meeting minimium standards - 3.0 GPA, for instance. So the state university can provide the athlete a 50% baseball scholarship and if the kid has a 3.0 in the classroom he'll also get state academic money. Potential is there is for it to be nearly a full scholarship, if both are factored in.
 
Another point is the ratio of affluent kids that play baseball as compared to football/basketball, but of course, especially football.

Simply a fact.
 
Advertisement
In Georgia a kid who graduates with a 3.8 gets his entire tuition paid by a state school under the hope scholarship. They even get some money at 3.0 and it goes to 100% as they reach 3.8. Which is also one of the hottest recruiting states in the country. Watch for all Georgia schools to take off because this is completely a disadvantage to schools in other states because their in state kids require virtually no scholarships at all (and they have tons of talent there) and they can give out of state kids 80-100%. I believe Miami has only given 100 % to one kid in the programs history.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Back
Top