forums

What has to be done

B

bigdaddiee

Recruit
Joined
Jan 31, 2012
Messages
80
Savanah st
Rosier 1st Q with First team
Perry 2nd Q with first team
Weldon 3rd Q with first team
Willams 4th Q with back ups

Toledo
Rosier 1st half with first team
Perry or Weldon 2nd half with first team
depending on who did better against Savanah st

Fiu
Rosier First half with first team
Perry or Weldon 2nd half with first team

After all three games decide your starter for UNC

Promise to never play Knowles or Dean again

Threaten your punter to do well or have nasty Nesta break his leg.

Have that fat *** kicker doing cardio all week during practice
 
Advertisement
I can agree with the Sav St. option, but give Perry or Weldon the keys after that game. We know Rosier cannot perform against good teams, so move on. Ain't nobody, including Richt, gonna sell me on anything Rosier.
 
What good does it do to put in Perry after Sav St. is down 24 points?

******* idiots around here
 
If Rosier goes 2 drives and produces nothing on offense vs Savannah state you have to move on to the next QB imo.
 
Mico Jones said:
It should be Rosier 2 series and the others the rest of the game split evenly.
Click to expand...

Agree. If this is how it's gonna be done, then Rosier should only get 2 series and then let the others rotate in for theirs.

Of course, it would be better to not have Rosier in the game at all, but...
 
Starters first start shouldn’t be against UNC, it should be FIU. That gives a week of practice, FIU, and another week of practice before UNC.
 
Advertisement
Rosier has been the starter in FOUR STRAIGHT LOSSES and has completed less than 50% and has looked like crap at QB.

there is no more debate......sit his sorry *** down and move on !
 
What is Rosier going to prove by playing against Savannah St or anyone else for that matter? He had an entire season, a conference championship game, a bowl game, a spring game, an off-season AND the opening game this season to prove himself.

Without bashing him (which is taking a lot) I dont see why he should be given another chance to show what he can do. It'll be some gaytor type sht if ANYONE around here uses Malik's games against Savannah St or FIU as proof that he should remain the starter. These games should be about giving the freshman starters reps. Not about letting Malik prove it. If he goes 20-20 with 500 yards & 5 TD against Savannah fckn State (who lost 52-0 to UAB)... so what?! If u fall for it, you're asking to be disappointed WHEN he fcks up AGAIN.
 
Rosier should never take another snap for us. It is detrimental to the development of the others.

Savannah State.
Weldon and Perry should get equal reps w first team the first three quarters.
Jarren gets fourth w second string

@Toledo.
If either Weldon or Perry have separated himself, name him the starter. Hopefully it’s a blowout. If so, get the other one meaningful snaps. Jarren gets mop up. Otherwise, see Savannah State rotation.

FIU.
Really need a starter at this point but if both are playing well, continue with them both.

And so on

Knowles should surrender #20 to Frierson or Carter and never play again. Hall and Carter need reps.

Ivey and Blades over Dean.
 
Advertisement
borncane said:
I dont think its a good idea to play 4 qb's in this game. Rosier gets first quarter. Perry then gets most the minutes with Weldon in mop up duty.

4 qb's in one game would be unheard of in my opinion.
Click to expand...

The question most of is have is why should Malik get the first quarter? Savannah St is terrible. If he is perfect.. So what? U know? What does that prove? Playing against them won't help him fix what he needs to fix if an entire offseason didn't. There is no reason whatsoever Malik should play an entire quarter. I honestly cant think of a reason he should play at all.
 
What can we possibly learn about Rosier that we don't already know? We've seen what he can do. He shouldn't play another down for us. The season is screwed if he's our best QB.
 
Malik shouldn't play another down at UM. I am still trying to figure out why posters keep saying Malik should play the first quarter. Explain what the point of that would be other than Richt not wanting to hurt his feelings? Malik is more liable of costing this team games than winning them. If you can't see that by now, I honestly don't know what to tell you other than you may need to get a CT scan of your brain.
 
Back
Top