We play road games at Toledo, Arkansas State, FAU

Advertisement
Since strength of schedule plays a major role in the committee decision making process, this is just proof that Folden-Flakes have no plans of trying to get into the playoff picture next year.
 
I'd rather play road games at those turds than have those turds stinking up my season tickets. That FAU game is going to be a long haul.
 
I don't think this should be trivialized. OOC scheduling is going to become a MAJOR factor going forward into the playoff era.

Our current admin has put us in the precarious situation of not only having to pay off a schitty corch's contract buyout but also payoff the buyout on some of these scrub teams we have scheduled until 2065.

If we are serious about being a national power in the playoff era we need to focus on Power 5 teams OOC with no more than 1 non Power 5 per season.
 
in the coming years.

Fire Blake James.

Nobody *****ed when we used to travel to East Carolina in the mid-80s. Other than the Earnest Byner years, they were awful. Same goes for our Cincinnati series in the 1980s and 1990s. They were just awful. We went to Memphis in 1996. When we scheduled San Diego State in the 1980s they sucked. It just worked out that when we played them they had Marshall Falk and Mark McGwire's little brother.

LOL, the Toledo home-and-home was made back in 2010.
 
Advertisement
You have to schedule in a way that makes it possible for Folden to win.....The Great White Hope.
 
in the coming years.

Fire Blake James.

Nobody ****ed when we used to travel to East Carolina in the mid-80s. Other than the Earnest Byner years, they were awful. Same goes for our Cincinnati series in the 1980s and 1990s. They were just awful. We went to Memphis in 1996. When we scheduled San Diego State in the 1980s they sucked. It just worked out that when we played them they had Marshall Falk and Mark McGwire's little brother.

LOL, the Toledo home-and-home was made back in 2010.

Your username should indicate some level of strategic thinking. Apparently that was wrong track mind.

We are not playing in the mid-80's, old school, grey hair, Cotton Bowl actually means something, era of football anymore.

We are playing in the right now, twitter my timbers, gimmie gimmie, playoff era. Strength of OOC schedule is going to be a MAJOR factor going forward. If James hasn't changed those schedules for the better or himself scheduled stronger opponents then it's on him.

Try and be somewhat coherent. I hate to think your username actually has real life connotations impacting our national defense.
 
I don't think this should be trivialized. OOC scheduling is going to become a MAJOR factor going forward into the playoff era.

Our current admin has put us in the precarious situation of not only having to pay off a schitty corch's contract buyout but also payoff the buyout on some of these scrub teams we have scheduled until 2065.

If we are serious about being a national power in the playoff era we need to focus on Power 5 teams OOC with no more than 1 non Power 5 per season.

I agree. The trend is to guarantee at least 1 big inter-sectional game each year. Schools like Oregon, Ohio State, etc. have 1 big game and then dogs behind them. Just win our conference. Shoot, just win our division.
 
I don't think this should be trivialized. OOC scheduling is going to become a MAJOR factor going forward into the playoff era.

Our current admin has put us in the precarious situation of not only having to pay off a schitty corch's contract buyout but also payoff the buyout on some of these scrub teams we have scheduled until 2065.

If we are serious about being a national power in the playoff era we need to focus on Power 5 teams OOC with no more than 1 non Power 5 per season.

I agree.

You just broke the internet.
 
Atleast the other schools will have their top recruits at these games lol, we will be there showcase game
 
in the coming years.

Fire Blake James.

Nobody ****ed when we used to travel to East Carolina in the mid-80s. Other than the Earnest Byner years, they were awful. Same goes for our Cincinnati series in the 1980s and 1990s. They were just awful. We went to Memphis in 1996. When we scheduled San Diego State in the 1980s they sucked. It just worked out that when we played them they had Marshall Falk and Mark McGwire's little brother.

LOL, the Toledo home-and-home was made back in 2010.

Your username should indicate some level of strategic thinking. Apparently that was wrong track mind.

We are not playing in the mid-80's, old school, grey hair, Cotton Bowl actually means something, era of football anymore.

We are playing in the right now, twitter my timbers, gimmie gimmie, playoff era. Strength of OOC schedule is going to be a MAJOR factor going forward. If James hasn't changed those schedules for the better or himself scheduled stronger opponents then it's on him.

Try and be somewhat coherent. I hate to think your username actually has real life connotations impacting our national defense.

Okay, internet tough guy I'll respond despite your nastiness. Outside of conference realignment, what has really changed regarding inter-sectional games. Let's look at the playoff team candidates. Oregon played Michigan State this year and next year. How about the rest of their OOC games this year and in the future? How about TCU or Baylor and their future schedules How about Ohio State? Look at traditional powers like Oklahoma.

That being said I don't disagree we should schedule 2 Power 5 games a year.
 
Advertisement
in the coming years.

Fire Blake James.

Nobody ****ed when we used to travel to East Carolina in the mid-80s. Other than the Earnest Byner years, they were awful. Same goes for our Cincinnati series in the 1980s and 1990s. They were just awful. We went to Memphis in 1996. When we scheduled San Diego State in the 1980s they sucked. It just worked out that when we played them they had Marshall Falk and Mark McGwire's little brother.

LOL, the Toledo home-and-home was made back in 2010.

Your username should indicate some level of strategic thinking. Apparently that was wrong track mind.

We are not playing in the mid-80's, old school, grey hair, Cotton Bowl actually means something, era of football anymore.

We are playing in the right now, twitter my timbers, gimmie gimmie, playoff era. Strength of OOC schedule is going to be a MAJOR factor going forward. If James hasn't changed those schedules for the better or himself scheduled stronger opponents then it's on him.

Try and be somewhat coherent. I hate to think your username actually has real life connotations impacting our national defense.

Okay, internet tough guy I'll respond despite your nastiness. Outside of conference realignment, what has really changed regarding inter-sectional games. Let's look at the playoff team candidates. Oregon played Michigan State this year and next year. How about the rest of their OOC games this year and in the future? How about TCU or Baylor and their future schedules How about Ohio State? Look at traditional powers like Oklahoma.

That being said I don't disagree we should schedule 2 Power 5 games a year.

You are only looking at what is. Not what will be. Let me tell you what will be. You obviously are oblivious.
In the NEAR future. Any Power 5 team that has more than 1 non-power 5 team on the schedule will NOT be allowed into the playoffs. This fact will get even worse when the playoffs are expanded to 8 teams. What teams did this year is ****. It only matters what the landscape will look like going forward. Try and look at it like that.


You broke the internet then you fixed it. Nastiness on my end or not you say some irrational things. I'll be in D.C in April maybe we can sit down for a drink youngin.
 
Last edited:
I just saw another thread saying Blake is a genius. So every other major that refuses to do home and homes with terrible teams must be living in 2000 and not setting trends like our prodigy.
 
in the coming years.

Fire Blake James.

Nobody ****ed when we used to travel to East Carolina in the mid-80s. Other than the Earnest Byner years, they were awful. Same goes for our Cincinnati series in the 1980s and 1990s. They were just awful. We went to Memphis in 1996. When we scheduled San Diego State in the 1980s they sucked. It just worked out that when we played them they had Marshall Falk and Mark McGwire's little brother.

LOL, the Toledo home-and-home was made back in 2010.

Your username should indicate some level of strategic thinking. Apparently that was wrong track mind.

We are not playing in the mid-80's, old school, grey hair, Cotton Bowl actually means something, era of football anymore.

We are playing in the right now, twitter my timbers, gimmie gimmie, playoff era. Strength of OOC schedule is going to be a MAJOR factor going forward. If James hasn't changed those schedules for the better or himself scheduled stronger opponents then it's on him.

Try and be somewhat coherent. I hate to think your username actually has real life connotations impacting our national defense.

Okay, internet tough guy I'll respond despite your nastiness. Outside of conference realignment, what has really changed regarding inter-sectional games. Let's look at the playoff team candidates. Oregon played Michigan State this year and next year. How about the rest of their OOC games this year and in the future? How about TCU or Baylor and their future schedules How about Ohio State? Look at traditional powers like Oklahoma.

That being said I don't disagree we should schedule 2 Power 5 games a year.

You broke the internet then you fixed it. Nastiness or not you say some irrational things.

Irrational? Hello, kettle meet pot. The trend is towards an 8-team playoff which means the 5 conference winners and 3 at-large berths. Unless you're in the SEC, if you don't win your conference or at lose your first game in the conference title game you're probably outside looking in. For most of these schools, it's about scheduling home dates. The trend is for 1 big inter-sectional game each year on schedule. That's a fact if you look through the schedules.
 
Nobody ****ed when we used to travel to East Carolina in the mid-80s. Other than the Earnest Byner years, they were awful. Same goes for our Cincinnati series in the 1980s and 1990s. They were just awful. We went to Memphis in 1996. When we scheduled San Diego State in the 1980s they sucked. It just worked out that when we played them they had Marshall Falk and Mark McGwire's little brother.

LOL, the Toledo home-and-home was made back in 2010.

Your username should indicate some level of strategic thinking. Apparently that was wrong track mind.

We are not playing in the mid-80's, old school, grey hair, Cotton Bowl actually means something, era of football anymore.

We are playing in the right now, twitter my timbers, gimmie gimmie, playoff era. Strength of OOC schedule is going to be a MAJOR factor going forward. If James hasn't changed those schedules for the better or himself scheduled stronger opponents then it's on him.

Try and be somewhat coherent. I hate to think your username actually has real life connotations impacting our national defense.

Okay, internet tough guy I'll respond despite your nastiness. Outside of conference realignment, what has really changed regarding inter-sectional games. Let's look at the playoff team candidates. Oregon played Michigan State this year and next year. How about the rest of their OOC games this year and in the future? How about TCU or Baylor and their future schedules How about Ohio State? Look at traditional powers like Oklahoma.

That being said I don't disagree we should schedule 2 Power 5 games a year.

You broke the internet then you fixed it. Nastiness or not you say some irrational things.

Irrational? Hello, kettle meet pot. The trend is towards an 8-team playoff which means the 5 conference winners and 3 at-large berths. Unless you're in the SEC, if you don't win your conference or at lose your first game in the conference title game you're probably outside looking in. For most of these schools, it's about scheduling home dates. The trend is for 1 big inter-sectional game each year on schedule. That's a fact if you look through the schedules.

Your problem is you are only looking at what IS. Not what will be.

People in your line of work should be much better at seeing what will be.

Once again. I'll be in D.C. in April. I'm buying stud.
 
Back
Top