Was it a fumble?

[wacane]

Sure looked like it from my seats

 

[ADELPHI]

Yes, it was. Remind me again why this wasn't challenged??

 

[miamicanesfan5x]

yes. don't know why we didn't throw the challenge flag on that.

 

[Gatorhater]

oh yeah it was

 

[CBurrr93]

Correct call. He was hit immediately as he hit the ground. I want miami to win as badly as anyone. Take the green glasses off

 

[CaneTime01]

Correct call. He was hit immediately as he hit the ground. I want miami to win as badly as anyone. Take the green glasses off

Agree. They would not have turned it over even on challenge. People get confused and think if he has 2 feet down with the ball then it's a fumble, but that's not the rule. The rule is you have to secure the catch and make a football move. He got hit as soon as he hit the ground so never made a football move

 

[ADELPHI]

Correct call. He was hit immediately as he hit the ground. I want miami to win as badly as anyone. Take the green glasses off

Bullshyt. The second hit caused the fumble after Oleary had both feet on the ground. That would have been reversed.

 

[moshated305]

It was a bang bang play, He got one foot down but never made a move up field. I think it was a legit call but the call on the next play was Mich worse. How the **** Lane was not called for holding, I have no idea.

 

[Notsince1985]

Um, he made a football move. The second hit caused the fumble. Clearly a fumble.