USF

Advertisement
USF is down and Hermans, with arguably "better" players than Maryland, got EXPOSED in every facet of the game against Maryland - just as I expected Hermans would. Maryland! Hermans used his "celebrity" to ask for even more from Texas (facilities, lockers, booster support, etc) administrators and gets completely out-classed/played/coached by Durkin and his players. Yet, Canes fans are supposed to pretend we pay attention to USF or their coach that just left the school Hermans now coaches for? Why? And, why do you have an axe to grind for Strong?

To answer your question, you WERE overreacting.
 
USF is down and Hermans, with arguably "better" players than Maryland, got EXPOSED in every facet of the game against Maryland - just as I expected Hermans would. Maryland! Hermans used his "celebrity" to ask for even more from Texas (facilities, lockers, booster support, etc) administrators and gets completely out-classed/played/coached by Durkin and his players. Yet, Canes fans are supposed to pretend we pay attention to USF or their coach that just left the school Hermans now coaches for? Why? And, why do you have an axe to grind for Strong?

To answer your question, you WERE overreacting.

Hard to understand what your rant is concerned with, but if part of it is about Herman getting more financial support than his predecessor, than you're right.
But that is how the business of college football works.
Look at Richt vs Golden at UM and so on.
It's Economics 101.

And, no, not a single fugg given about Strong or USF.
But I do like to see all Florida schools that is not UM lose as often as possible.
 
I don't no have an "axe" to grind with Charlie but a lot of posters here wanted him so **** bad.

In other news UNC lost today

Pitt needed overtime to beat Youngstown.
 
Back
Top