- Joined
- Jan 6, 2019
- Messages
- 1,511
This question has been racking my brain for the better part of a year now, and I just wanted to get some opinions from the folks here. Little backdrop: House was built in 1990, is completely paid off, but is in serious need of updating/renovations. I have about 300k in savings so I could fully fund the renovation but I was planning on keeping that in savings so me and the wife could hopefully retire a few years sooner. I thought about selling the house “as is” and find something brand new of equal or lesser value to avoid all of those renovation headaches. Do I really want to deal with the headaches involved in moving all that stuff into a new home though? Another factor to take into account is I plan on leaving the house to the kids eventually so this would save them the hassle of having to renovate it themselves down the road. Lastly, I could just put a bandaid on the house and just do very minor fixes until we eventually leave it to the kids.
Just curious what everyone thinks and where do they stand on this issue. Thanks!
Just curious what everyone thinks and where do they stand on this issue. Thanks!