**** too against BC. Forget what anybody says in college a win is a win. We didn't have a good game today against a team who had nothing to lose, and a team with nothing to lose is a dangerous team. A Fake field goal, a halfback pass, going for it on 4th downs. etc etc. We grew up a little bit today due to the adversity no matter how ugly it was. And we will be ready for VT next week. Bank on it!
Your Argument is as Flawed as a Steer attempting to impregnate a Cow. BC was no Slouch in 2001. For years, folks have been using the 2001 BC game to discredit the greatness of the 2001 Canes. Today, WE PUT THAT RIDICULOUS ARGUMENT TO BED FOREVER.
Facts:
1. In 2001, BC was not 1 - 7 (like UNC) when we played them. BC was 6-2.
2. In 2001, BC Lost 4 games (Stanford,
#6 V.Tech ,
#1 Miami and
#22 Syracuse).
3. Combined record of the opponents that beat BC: 41 - 9 Average: 10.25 wins. Only Stanford (9-3) failed to win 10 games.
4. 3 of BC's 4 losses occurred on the Road. The only team to beat BC at Home in 2001? You Guessed it...The Canes.
5. Each team that beat BC finished the 2001 season ranked in the Top 25 of the AP/Coaches Polls.
Miami: National Champions
Syracuse: AP
#1 4 Coaches
#1 4
Stanford: AP
#1 6 Coaches # 17
V.Tech: AP
#1 8 Coaches
#1 8
6. BC finished the 2001 season Ranked: AP
#2 1 Coaches
#2 3
Again, BC was not a Slouch in 2001. They were a quality team that you had to beat, even on an off day. So, the next time someone mentions that the 2001 Canes struggled against a poor BC team, educate them of the facts.
So, OP, comparing the UNC game or any other poor performance to the 2001 Canes v. BC game is unintelligent.