Star Rankings and Super Bowl Starters

Advertisement
“Coach Bill Belichick is doing less with more with this defense.”

Pretty sure the author meant more with less.
 
Advertisement
Aaron Donald was quite a recruiting catch. Wasn't he at Pitt when the guy who went to Wisconsin was there? Guy has an eye for linemen.
 
Six 5-star players in the top 44 (between the 4 starting 11s).
Three of those six 5-stars are from Florida.
Two of the six 5-star players are from Broward County (Lamarcus Joyner & Sony Michel).
Interesting.
 
Advertisement
As in most of the NFL offensive linemen are the hardest to predict from HS to College and from College to the Pros.
 
People don’t know how to read numbers. Seeing as in the average year there are about 30 5 stars on rivals , so over 4 years 120 in college Ifno one injured quit, failed out, and then in the pros there are 32 teams, the fact that these two teams have 7 5 stars starting seems to be a good ******* indicator that relative to an available pool of players, 5 stars matter.
 
Oh boy, the star gazing continues, first off, its obvious there are more so called 3 and 4 star players that's more important than the so called 5 star players, and sony michel just got to the cheatriots this year, they didnt need em last year to get to the superbowl, but these nerd recruiting sites keep trying their hardest to be come more relevant by the day. The sad thing for those who keep getting caught up and relying on the star system is, why dont they do an article that explains why its more so called 2 star and non-ranked players in the superbowl than the so called 5 star players, lol. Also, how much sense does it make for these imbeciles to try and write an article to try and justify their clown rating system when clearly if you've ever read their write ups on a so called 2 star or non-ranked player, they basically saying they have little to no shot at playing in college let alone making it to the pro's. And if any player makes it to the nfl, obviously, the majority of them have performed higher than the nerd recruiting sites who like their pops before them in mel kiper, trying to force their way into becoming relevant. **** if they were so relevant,let's just get rid of all these scouting teams and go by these nerd recruiting sites, unbelievable! Shouts out to all the so called 2 stars and unranked players in the nfl, can you even label a guy in the nfl as a 2star or unranked:

 
Advertisement
Oh boy, the star gazing continues, first off, its obvious there are more so called 3 and 4 star players that's more important than the so called 5 star players, and sony michel just got to the cheatriots this year, they didnt need em last year to get to the superbowl, but these nerd recruiting sites keep trying their hardest to be come more relevant by the day. The sad thing for those who keep getting caught up and relying on the star system is, why dont they do an article that explains why its more so called 2 star and non-ranked players in the superbowl than the so called 5 star players, lol. Also, how much sense does it make for these imbeciles to try and write an article to try and justify their clown rating system when clearly if you've ever read their write ups on a so called 2 star or non-ranked player, they basically saying they have little to no shot at playing in college let alone making it to the pro's. And if any player makes it to the nfl, obviously, the majority of them have performed higher than the nerd recruiting sites who like their pops before them in mel kiper, trying to force their way into becoming relevant. **** if they were so relevant,let's just get rid of all these scouting teams and go by these nerd recruiting sites, unbelievable! Shouts out to all the so called 2 stars and unranked players in the nfl, can you even label a guy in the nfl as a 2star or unranked:


Lmao

This is the most get off my lawn, old man yelling at clouds, those kids and their **** itablets post I have ever seen.

The ignorance is so thick I feel like it is a troll. All it is missing is “Ed Reed was a two star!!”
 
Lmao

This is the most get off my lawn, old man yelling at clouds, those kids and their **** itablets post I have ever seen.

The ignorance is so thick I feel like it is a troll. All it is missing is “Ed Reed was a two star!!”

It doesnt matter if you have bad vision, the facts are clear!
 
Advertisement
People don’t know how to read numbers. Seeing as in the average year there are about 30 5 stars on rivals , so over 4 years 120 in college Ifno one injured quit, failed out, and then in the pros there are 32 teams, the fact that these two teams have 7 5 stars starting seems to be a good ******* indicator that relative to an available pool of players, 5 stars matter.

or does it mean that 5 stars typically go to the best coaching staffs and get the most opportunities to succeed in college? But your math is clearly faulty... the NFL teams are compromised mostly of 12 years of drafts, not 4 years of recruiting.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top