Sometimes it Is the scheme, and not the talent

  • Thread starter Thread starter deleted4920
  • Start date Start date
D

deleted4920

Guest
When endured the Onofrio years ( " D" deliberately removed) when I and others would complain about our woeful defense some fans and media would defend it by claiming " so you think its as easy to fix as running a 4-3?" or " do you think you would do a better job"?


To which I would answer an emphatic YES to both.

We have gone from defenses ranked # 70-90 to, this year, basically 1-4 in every significant category. A MAJOR reason is Diaz' 4-3 and more aggressive scheme.

Obviously in every sport its the player who makes or doesn't make the plays. But the scheme is a factor too. So when apologist argue we have a subpar O line, I reply by saying its the COACHES job to minimize the risks posed by a bad o line, or qb, with a scheme design. Is anyone claiming UCF's o line is filled with all americans? Your job as a coach is to run plays where your line doesn't have to hold their blocks as long, where your qb has quick, easy reads.

Ive watched a lot of football and essentially coaches come in 2 types: one type makes the player fit his scheme come **** or high water; the other type ADAPTS his scheme to his players. Don Shula would be in the latter category . Richt appears to be in the former , which is nice, IF your talent fits your scheme. Never mind that part of his job is to acquire that talent, but the point is that anyone who says that the scheme is not a big part of a team performance on Fridays, Saturdays or Sundays doesn't know enough about this game. You may not scheme your way to the NC, but you sure as **** at Miami should be able to scheme wins over BC, UVA and Duke.
 
Advertisement
The difference is the DC? Not the senior/junior laden defense? MJJ, JJ, Gerald Willis, the 3 LBs, Redwine, etc

Just saying Golden had these guys recruited/committed and these guys were an upgrade as a whole over what he had before.

All these stats are nice and Diaz has done a great job this season but what offense have we played that is worth a ****? Last two real offenses we faced in Clemson/Wisconsin ripped us apart. **** UVA last year with a real QB lit up the defense.

Next year will be the real test if Diaz is a real DC. I wouldn't be surprised if he bolts either knowing all the talent leaving.
 
Stats are stats....they either count as a barometer of something or they don't. The point is that the D has MEASURABLY improved, and I attributr that mostly to coaching, which includes a scheme change.

The O can do it too IF we change scheme.
 
Stats are stats....they either count as a barometer of something or they don't. The point is that the D has MEASURABLY improved, and I attributr that mostly to coaching, which includes a scheme change.

The O can do it too IF we change scheme.

If we had competent QB play we'd have 1 loss right now. People **** on Kaaya but at least he could complete a 6 yard slant and didn't need his held hand after every play

That's on Richt though
 
Back
Top