Canedude08
Sophomore
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2014
- Messages
- 8,110
These kids were getting paid BEFORE(Significantly less than they were truly worth, but paid), what's your point? Was it better when boosters could buy kids under the table, and thanks to the corruption of the NCAA, they were allowed to get away with it? Amazing that true capitalism becomes an issue when the wrong people start getting paid. There sure as **** isn't a salary cap in regards to what a coach can make, same with Athletic Directors and other department staff. No one is coming to a Miami game to watch Mario, no one is coming to watch Rad stand around. We are coming to see the student athletes, and honestly, they should be paid a fair market wage, just like I was when I decided to tutor for extra money in Law School. My scholarship wasn't at risk if I did so, I could have written a best selling novel, no one would have said a **** thing about me getting paid to attend school.I disagree with the premise that people are concerned about NIL because "the field hands are getting paid". THAT is not an issue. The ISSUE is that it is now legal for the schools with the deepest pocket boosters to simply buy the top 250 recruits each year. Oil money supported programs like Texas and TAM, and a couple of select programs like Bama, Tn., LSU, might simply be purchasing the top 100 players each season with a crazy level of remuneration, making it virtually impossible other programs to compete. THE SOLUTION ... is for some set of rules / regulations that are identical in EACH STATE. Right now each state has different regulations, some permitting schools and coaches to be directly involved in directing players to NIL offers, other states like Florida prohibit that involvement.
Adapt or Die. Period.