HighSeas
Sophomore
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
- Messages
- 4,827
Let's step away from the incessant QB and OL pass protection worries. Am I alone in thinking this (thread title) is a concern or at least a curiosity? I'm confident that this offense has the scheme and talent to move the ball between the 20s but there are question marks beyond that. The strength of the offensive line is movement and athleticism but for years we haven't seen a Miami offensive line that can drive bodies in tight quarters. This unit is even smaller than in past years. My favorite red zone run schemes are power blocking schemes like G-lead. Can we execute those effectively?
At WR we have Hightower as the only big-bodied guy who excels at contested catches. He needs to be on the field in the red zone but will he be? Osborn is tough and skilled but doesn't have a size advantage against UF corners. Jordan is obviously proven as a red zone weapon but throwing him 50-50 balls on fades or nod routes is no different from Richt's unimaginative offense. That's not the most efficient way to score.
Window dressing like motion and misdirection is good but when you get in constricted spaces there are diminishing returns as defenses stack fronts and shoot gaps aggressively. This is where spread option concepts become essential - recall Clemson would rely heavily on Kelly Bryant's legs in short yardage downs. Is Enos willing to let Jarren loose as a runner like that or is this where Tate gets his number called?
At Arkansas Enos had 2 years where they ranked high in RZ TD% so I know he can design offense in that area of the field. The question is whether we have the personnel to execute there. I'm optimistic but it's a valid concern for the unit as a whole and merits discussion at least.
At WR we have Hightower as the only big-bodied guy who excels at contested catches. He needs to be on the field in the red zone but will he be? Osborn is tough and skilled but doesn't have a size advantage against UF corners. Jordan is obviously proven as a red zone weapon but throwing him 50-50 balls on fades or nod routes is no different from Richt's unimaginative offense. That's not the most efficient way to score.
Window dressing like motion and misdirection is good but when you get in constricted spaces there are diminishing returns as defenses stack fronts and shoot gaps aggressively. This is where spread option concepts become essential - recall Clemson would rely heavily on Kelly Bryant's legs in short yardage downs. Is Enos willing to let Jarren loose as a runner like that or is this where Tate gets his number called?
At Arkansas Enos had 2 years where they ranked high in RZ TD% so I know he can design offense in that area of the field. The question is whether we have the personnel to execute there. I'm optimistic but it's a valid concern for the unit as a whole and merits discussion at least.