forums

Question

Advertisement
Mike Thot said:
So as I suspected you made up the "The ONLY reason why we broke tendency is because Richt was trying to get Langham a TD on Senior Day. " ..to take a petty shot " I don't think it had anything at all to do about breaking tendency in a strategic way. " at the coach.

It's all good dude but just admit it rather than doubling down.

If the game was in hand (it was) and CMR was simpy doling out good will to seniors as you claims Rosier would have gotten some snaps. Can't have it both ways.
Click to expand...
That’s the only thing that makes sense.
 
g8rh8rMD said:
This is not to mention the fact that calling a fade route may be the laziest play call in football. Well, maybe 2nd laziest right after FB dive. Now, if they had come out in some sort of bunch formation and run a scrape concept creating traffic for the DB's to run through and tried to actually scheme a guy open, then we might have something to talk about.

I'm convinced that the BOT, while ponying up big for coaching salaries and facilities, has insisted that they can't afford to upgrade the film facilities for the football offices beyond Charlie Chaplin silent film tech, and Richt hasn't heard of HD or digital memory devices, so Mark and Jon are truly unaware of modern offense. (sarcasm)
Click to expand...
You know it’s crazy..I saw one of the most high powered offenses actually run a FB dive twice in one game on 3&1..and they threw fade routes in the Endzone..I just couldn’t help but think of this board when I saw..it blew my ******* mind.🤯..but in all seriousness down and 1 or less to go that play probably has the highest success rate in a playbook nowadays. That and a QB power or sneak. Our success rate on that play was likely over 75%..fades in the red zone are the same story. Every offense runs them..so as far as things to make a thread about highlighting or sorry *** O...these two are probaly the worse points to use
 
Back
Top