Great point.... but that raises the question, did Gattis have anyone that would want to come with him? That should've been a tell-tale point if any.
I didn’t want Kinsgbury for his play calling. I was hoping to see his wife at games.
No idea, I don't think Gattis is extremely well liked considering he's still unemployed to my knowledge. Could be a mix of both.
He brought one GA from Mich, Nate Crutchfield. Worked with QBs
247sports.com
So is that on Mario or Gattis? You would think if Gattis was anywhere near competent he would have asked as part of his negotiations to bring some of his own analysts at the very least. Maybe that right there should have been a big red flag to Mario.
Because no one likes Gattis lol Was definitely a red flag
He’s being hired as an Analyst...
Whenever I hear "Sports are too analytical" takes, I can't help but laugh. We get it, some older people think this fancy math stuff is confusing, but there's a reason why it's being used.
The hilarious thing is that analytics have been around for decades
They've taken a huge step forward in the last 15-20 years though. The ability to track almost anything to microscopic precision is a huge reason why. Where in previous decades, you had to have a person sit there and track certain things, and then plug in the numbers, a lot of it can be done via tech now, meaning you can get deeper and deeper with stuff. Look at a shot chart from 20 years ago and compare it to now. It's scary how accurate it is, and they can get even more detailed with it, showing that a guy shoots different percentages from practically the same spot depending on shot clock.
