forums

Let's be honest...

fraggle

fraggle

Senile Senior
Joined
Nov 7, 2011
Messages
2,973
Louisville was the BETTER TEAM. They blocked better they tackled better and they schemed better. If we played again, who would win? Methinks the hype gave our guys false confidence and the effort just wasn't there. Mario has stated we weren't there yet before this game so HOPEFULLY this is a wake up call that we need to get to work or we will be like PSU of fsu, loaded with talent but not quite a TEAM. Can mercenaries gel into a TEAM, it seemed like it most of last year until the collapse. An angry TEAM would come out and destroy Stanford...lets see how our TEAM performs Saturday Emphasiing
TEAM, not Beck, not Bain...our TEAN unit needs to give 100 percent at all 11 positions.
 
Advertisement
fraggle said:
Louisville was the BETTER TEAM. They blocked better they tackled better and they schemed better. If we played again, who would win? Methinks the hype gave our guys false confidence and the effort just wasn't there. Mario has stated we weren't there yet before this game so HOPEFULLY this is a wake up call that we need to get to work or we will be like PSU of fsu, loaded with talent but not quite a TEAM. Can mercenaries gel into a TEAM, it seemed like it most of last year until the collapse. An angry TEAM would come out and destroy Stanford...lets see how our TEAM performs Saturday Emphasiing
TEAM, not Beck, not Bain...our TEAN unit needs to give 100 percent at all 11 positions.
Click to expand...

There are 22 positions.

We can’t win if only 11 try their hardest.
 
fraggle said:
Louisville was the BETTER TEAM. They blocked better they tackled better and they schemed better. If we played again, who would win? Methinks the hype gave our guys false confidence and the effort just wasn't there. Mario has stated we weren't there yet before this game so HOPEFULLY this is a wake up call that we need to get to work or we will be like PSU of fsu, loaded with talent but not quite a TEAM. Can mercenaries gel into a TEAM, it seemed like it most of last year until the collapse. An angry TEAM would come out and destroy Stanford...lets see how our TEAM performs Saturday Emphasiing
TEAM, not Beck, not Bain...our TEAN unit needs to give 100 percent at all 11 positions.
Click to expand...
Boy you trying too hard. It’s simple we got outcoached and out schemed
 
KingB02 said:
Boy you trying too hard. It’s simple we got outcoached and out schemed
Click to expand...
I was listening to a Miami podcast yesterday and they brought up a very interesting point: Leading up to the game all week they basically asked Brohm about Miami’s defensive approach/game plan and he said, and I’m paraphrasing, “Miami really doesn’t do anything special or innovative scheme-wise, they just have a lot better athletes than everyone else.” If you think about it, hasn’t this been the problem at Miami for many, many years now? The same problem can be said for the offense as well. A schematic bore. I’d love to actually be able to pair our superior athletes with coordinators who attack and know how to scheme it up.
 
fraggle said:
Louisville was the BETTER TEAM. They blocked better they tackled better and they schemed better. If we played again, who would win? Methinks the hype gave our guys false confidence and the effort just wasn't there. Mario has stated we weren't there yet before this game so HOPEFULLY this is a wake up call that we need to get to work or we will be like PSU of fsu, loaded with talent but not quite a TEAM. Can mercenaries gel into a TEAM, it seemed like it most of last year until the collapse. An angry TEAM would come out and destroy Stanford...lets see how our TEAM performs Saturday Emphasiing
TEAM, not Beck, not Bain...our TEAN unit needs to give 100 percent at all 11 positions.
Click to expand...
Yes, and our QB threw 4 picks

And we still were right there for the win. We are good, just not good enough to win with our C game against good teams.
 
Advertisement
DoctorKrazey said:
I was listening to a Miami podcast yesterday and they brought up a very interesting point: Leading up to the game all week they basically asked Brohm about Miami’s defensive approach/game plan and he said, and I’m paraphrasing, “Miami really doesn’t do anything special or innovative scheme-wise, they just have a lot better athletes than everyone else.” If you think about it, hasn’t this been the problem at Miami for many, many years now? The same problem can be said for the offense as well. A schematic bore. I’d love to actually be able to pair our superior athletes with coordinators who attack and know how to scheme it up.
Click to expand...
Nope! It’s just too much to ask for! On defense we started doing too much. Moving guys around and stunting taking guys out of where they’re running into lmao. Just play them straight up! Get guys upfield and attack instead of all this sideways bull****! On offense we don’t use the entire field. Make them have to defend the entire field! We run too many plays to the short side of the field. And we all know how ****** this run scheme is. No creativity in this offense AT ALL! Have we ran a seam route with our TEs AT ALL?! I see Lofton open a lot and just doesn’t get looks. Dude gets super frustrated cause he’s ALWAYS open! D-money said on his podcast Lofton has been disappointing, but he’s been open Smh. He was supposed to be our best player, but is not getting looks, even though he’s been open AF
 
G3nqjerWMAADDr3.jpeg
 
Go Canes!! said:
There are 22 positions.

We can’t win if only 11 try their hardest.
Click to expand...
11 on the field at one time except opponents who usually have 12. You forgot Special Teams so 33 is your number not 22. Sure looks like we don't get the holding calls against our offense we should.
 
Last edited:
DoctorKrazey said:
I was listening to a Miami podcast yesterday and they brought up a very interesting point: Leading up to the game all week they basically asked Brohm about Miami’s defensive approach/game plan and he said, and I’m paraphrasing, “Miami really doesn’t do anything special or innovative scheme-wise, they just have a lot better athletes than everyone else.” If you think about it, hasn’t this been the problem at Miami for many, many years now? The same problem can be said for the offense as well. A schematic bore. I’d love to actually be able to pair our superior athletes with coordinators who attack and know how to scheme it up.
Click to expand...
We follow traditional play calling and never seem innovative or take chances
 
KingB02 said:
Nope! It’s just too much to ask for! On defense we started doing too much. Moving guys around and stunting taking guys out of where they’re running into lmao. Just play them straight up! Get guys upfield and attack instead of all this sideways bull****! On offense we don’t use the entire field. Make them have to defend the entire field! We run too many plays to the short side of the field. And we all know how ****** this run scheme is. No creativity in this offense AT ALL! Have we ran a seam route with our TEs AT ALL?! I see Lofton open a lot and just doesn’t get looks. Dude gets super frustrated cause he’s ALWAYS open! D-money said on his podcast Lofton has been disappointing, but he’s been open Smh. He was supposed to be our best player, but is not getting looks, even though he’s been open AF
Click to expand...
I thought this was going to be Loftons year to shine...what happened?
 
I see no innovation or motivation other than maybe some of the players picking up their NIL checks.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top