GojiraCane
All American
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
- Messages
- 10,383
The following is a side-by-side roster comparison of current rosters for Miami and Virginia Tech heading into tomorrow's game.
Names in green denote incoming players in their first year in their respective programs:
AVERAGE COLLEGE EXPERIENCE
If special teams are excluded, Miami's composite is .9074. Virginia Tech would be .8694
MIAMI POSITION ADVANTAGES (RATING)
Names in green denote incoming players in their first year in their respective programs:
AVERAGE COLLEGE EXPERIENCE
- 2025: 1.77 years (Miami), 2.00 years (Virginia Tech)
- 2024: 1.81 years (Miami), 1.96 years (Virginia Tech)
- 2025: 0.9024 (Miami), .8648 (Virginia Tech) *
- 2024: 0.9010 (Miami), .8582 (Virginia Tech)
If special teams are excluded, Miami's composite is .9074. Virginia Tech would be .8694
MIAMI POSITION ADVANTAGES (RATING)
- Wide Receiver (Miami .9252, Virginia Tech .8838)
- Tight End (Miami .8846, Virginia Tech .8616)
- Running Back (Miami .9064, Virginia Tech .8654)
- Offensive Line (Miami .8922, Virginia Tech .8708)
- Quarterback (Miami .9062, Virginia Tech .8672)
- Defensive Tackle (Miami .9213, Virginia Tech .8673)
- Defensive End (Miami .9301, Virginia Tech .8682)
- Linebacker (Miami .9002, Virginia Tech .8657)
- Safety (Miami .8960, Virginia Tech .8689)
- Cornerback (Miami .9083, Virginia Tech .8604)
- Special Teams (Virginia Tech .7393, Miami .6999)
- Wide Receiver (.9252 vs .9237)
- Offensive Line (.8922 vs .8884)
- Quarterbacks (.9062 vs .8870)
- Defensive Tackle (.9213 vs .9064)
- Defensive End (.9301 vs .9260)
- Safety (.8960 vs .8952)
- Cornerback (.9083 vs 9008)
- Wide Receiver (.8838 vs .8804)
- Tight End (.8616 vs .8574)
- Offensive Line (.8708 vs .8551)
- Quarterback (.8895 vs .8799)
- Defensive End (.8682 vs .8665)
- Linebacker (.8657 vs .8466)
- Safety (.8689 vs .8671)
- Cornerback (.8604 vs .8493)
- Virginia Tech has the third most collective CFB experience of any FCS team that Miami has faced this season, just behind SMU and averaging 2.0 years. Miami was defeated by the two other teams with the highest CFB experience
- Virginia Tech's safety room is outsized; they have 10 safeties on the roster compared to Miami's six
- Miami has 22 transfer portal players on the roster compared to 22 the previous season
- Virginia Tech has 35 transfer portal players on the roster compared to just 14 the previous season. 30 arrived this offseason
- Miami brings in 42 new players this season, Virginia Tech 50
- .9012 - Notre Dame (1.61 avg CFB experience)
- .8446 - South Florida (1.91 avg CFB experience)
- .8972 - Florida (1.58 avg CFB experience)
- .8909 - Florida State (1.81 avg CFB experience)
- .8616 - Louisville (2.43 avg CFB experience)
- .8654 - Stanford (1.89 avg CFB experience)
- .8603 - SMU (2.02 avg CFB experience)
- .8462 - Syracuse (1.68 avg CFB experience)
- .8657 - NC State (1.59 avg CFB experience)
- .8648 - Virginia Tech (2.00 CFB experience)
Last edited: