- Joined
- Oct 7, 2012
- Messages
- 17,755
I use to get bothered by these rankings ... Until I figured out that is the exact intent of having them ... To get a response from fans.
They don't release these rankings for logic, they release them to tell the media where to focus their energies.
And while it would be great for us to be winning the way UGA and Bama are, the committee doesn't really care. If they did, UCF would be ranked higher than Wisconsin ... Considering they have a common opponent, and UCF beat Maryland by more.
So ... I'll just worry about about beating VT this week.
If we end up undefeated having beat VT, ND and Clem/NC St we'll be in the playoff easily
Totally agree, these rankings don't mean a hill of beans to Miami currently. Win the next two then we can start *****ing. The team needs to focus on VT. The "one game at a time" mentality.I use to get bothered by these rankings ... Until I figured out that is the exact intent of having them ... To get a response from fans.
They don't release these rankings for logic, they release them to tell the media where to focus their energies.
And while it would be great for us to be winning the way UGA and Bama are, the committee doesn't really care. If they did, UCF would be ranked higher than Wisconsin ... Considering they have a common opponent, and UCF beat Maryland by more.
So ... I'll just worry about about beating VT this week.
Well, yes, but these rankings are kind of important
Well, yes, but these rankings are kind of important
If we win out we go to the playoff.
Bottom line.
I'll never understand the people who get fired up about these things (or even read about them).
I'm not fired up, for the record. I posted them because they're relevant.
The one part that sucks is why do some 1 loss teams get n if they win out when’s 1 loss UM will plummet?