How do you not argue that call?

Advertisement
It was so blatantly bad. Game Changer. That was some of the laziest coaching I can remember.
And that would have produced what exactly other than on notice for the next bad call. It was horrible because they stopped play. Worst case it would have been a force out which they negated as soon as they call him out.
 
You tell them to take it to review on the runner not the catch. That was an epic failure on the head man.
 
You tell them to take it to review on the runner not the catch. That was an epic failure on the head man.
Review on which runner? The issue was the umpire called the batter out. If the ruling stood and the batter was out, then you appeal second. We never saw if he left early or not. Where they blew it is they called the play dead. At minimum Miami would have and should have been allowed a force at second. It was Louisville who initiated the first review. It was not an epic failure on the head man. It was a blown call by the ACC crew.
 
You can challenge the runner and his location upon the play being called dead they just reviewed the out. Thus you ask questions. Do you coach baseball?
 
Advertisement
You can challenge the runner and his location upon the play being called dead they just reviewed the out. Thus you ask questions. Do you coach baseball?
Of course you can but to what end? Villar never attempted a force play at second.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top