Empirical Cane
We are what we repeatedly do.
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2018
- Messages
- 45,175
Last year, there was a ton of criticism of San Mario "forcing his system" onto the players on the roster rather than maximizing a system "for the players on tbe roster".
I disagreed with that take for Miami's long-term success, but fair point for sure from differing contexts on how to win with a program.
This year, there are has been a ton of bellyaching and heavy menstruating about the lack of offensive production going back to GT with the "Dawson is having to mold to Mario's ways..."
Here's where I'd say this criticisms are off the mark.
When faced with near-peer/peer competitors (minus outlier of aTm), the negative common demoninator has been QB1 play. Specifically as follows:
QB1 TVD:
- Incompletions due to low percentage double-covered WRs with others wide open
- Interceptions
QB1 EW
- Incompletions due to nervous yips
QB1 TVD now has 12Qs + 1OT w/ subpar play and catastrophic INTs (5 TD : 7 INT)
- Confidence cratering, not rebounding
- Trending down heavily
QB1 EW now has 4Qs + 1OT (1 TD : 1 INT)
- Confidence started low, gained pace by 4Q
- Trending up
Mario, as he should, allows Dawson to run the offfense. Now through his last 12Qs + OT of play, for whatever reason, TVD is limiting the play calling and results not the playcalling itself.
Contrast this with what we saw QB1 EW allow for with slow and deliberate opening of the playbook in just 4Qs. As EW's confidence grew, the play calling and results were expanded.
It's hard to be so ruthless in a ruthless industry because we forget these are still young adults, but they are well paid young adults.
The answer is very clear: sit TVD and start EW.
The data are what the data are.
I disagreed with that take for Miami's long-term success, but fair point for sure from differing contexts on how to win with a program.
This year, there are has been a ton of bellyaching and heavy menstruating about the lack of offensive production going back to GT with the "Dawson is having to mold to Mario's ways..."
Here's where I'd say this criticisms are off the mark.
When faced with near-peer/peer competitors (minus outlier of aTm), the negative common demoninator has been QB1 play. Specifically as follows:
QB1 TVD:
- Incompletions due to low percentage double-covered WRs with others wide open
- Interceptions
QB1 EW
- Incompletions due to nervous yips
QB1 TVD now has 12Qs + 1OT w/ subpar play and catastrophic INTs (5 TD : 7 INT)
- Confidence cratering, not rebounding
- Trending down heavily
QB1 EW now has 4Qs + 1OT (1 TD : 1 INT)
- Confidence started low, gained pace by 4Q
- Trending up
Mario, as he should, allows Dawson to run the offfense. Now through his last 12Qs + OT of play, for whatever reason, TVD is limiting the play calling and results not the playcalling itself.
Contrast this with what we saw QB1 EW allow for with slow and deliberate opening of the playbook in just 4Qs. As EW's confidence grew, the play calling and results were expanded.
It's hard to be so ruthless in a ruthless industry because we forget these are still young adults, but they are well paid young adults.
The answer is very clear: sit TVD and start EW.
The data are what the data are.