FANS BACK IN STANDS

Advertisement
Y'all watch this closely because if this works we might be closer to having fans in stands than we think


Since there is absolutely no way to track infections after attendance im sure theyll call it a great success.
 
Last edited:
Y'all watch this closely because if this works we might be closer to having fans in stands than we think



So you think that putting 1,000 people in a racetrack that has a grandstand capacity of 46,000 (and even more if you include the infield) will somehow be a fast-track towards getting back to full capacity?

Ooooo...kkkkk...
 
If fans can go to WalMart they should be able to go to a football stadium.

With restrictions, yes. I wouldn't want to go to a stadium with people slobbing around me in all directions of a packed stadium after every touchdown
 
Advertisement
We are 3 months away from football season so yes


He said to "watch this closely" and "if this works".

I'm simply saying that putting 1,000 vets in Homestead as spectators is more of a PR stunt than it is a literal test of how to put fans back in the stands.

This means nothing. Unless anyone thinks that putting 1,000 vets in Joe Robbie Stadium is a good idea for UM football.

People are being very unrealistic about this issue. Putting 1,000 people in a 46,000 capacity grandstand proves nothing and does nothing. The real issues will be whether there will be any testing or protective measures taken, either by the ticket takers/concession areas, or in providing things to fans, such as masks, gloves, etc.

If people want to get all jacked up about 1,000 military vets watching the Homestead race, knock yourself out.
 
I think you can probable see about 25% capacity in stadiums come fall


How? Because we slowly increase capacity? Or because certain specific precautions are taken?

I understand hope and optimism, but most people want to hear the specifics.
 
Here is my proposal:

-player family and friends
-staff family and friends
-recruits family and friends
-select number of fans may enter based on knowledge of Canes trivia.

Do not allow the tailgating element (those who only attend games to party/tailgate and who couldn't name 5 players on the rooster. They only care about being seen on the jumbotrons flashing The U and dancing to reggaeton, mumble rap and house music).
 
Last edited:
Here is my proposal:

-player family and friends
-staff family and friends
-recruits family and friends
-select number of fans may enter based on knowledge of Canes trivia. Do not allow the tailgating element (those who only attend games to party/tailgate and who couldn't name 5 players on the rooster. They only care about being seen on the jumbotrons flashing The U and dancing to reggaeton, mumble rap and house music).


I may be biased, but I think the "fans" category is going to start, end, and be defined by UM alum status and Hurricane Club contribution level.

Here are the real issues. Logistics and staffing.

For example, the NASCAR article quotes Daryl Wolfe, who is a friend of mine. I know how the NASCAR races are staffed, and there are different issues they will face at Homestead (near a major city) and Talladega (uh, NOT near a major city).

Racetracks and football stadiums do not have a large permanent labor pool. You are more likely to find regular employees at arenas that host multiple sports and concerts.

NASCAR hires a lot of temp employees (ticket takers and people who sell or vend beer/alcohol) and they use a lot of Boy Scout troops/cheerleading teams/local churches & charities to staff the food & soda sales stands.

So, yes, it may be easy to require masks or to restrict access to the infield, but it is going to be very difficult to get the personnel and equipment necessary to do screening/testing at the turnstiles. NASCAR races and football games usually hire off-duty cops from multiple surrounding jurisdictions (and rural locations have a tougher time), but it is going to be a very tall order to be able to get any sort of medical-trained staff such as nurses, EMTs, and/or doctors.

What this means for college football is very interesting, because the larger your (target) attendance numbers get, the more personnel you need to hire, both at the gate (testing) and inside the venue (food/beverage, ushers, ticket takers, etc.). If you are trying to hold a hundred D-1A football games (nearly all of which are played on Saturdays), then you have to try to get a massive number of off-duty nurses/EMTs/doctors to all of these stadiums (many of which are in rural areas with not nearly the same density of hospitals that you find in a city) in order to do the testing at the turnstiles.

So, yeah, I'd like to see capacity increased...but there are a lot of logistical and staffing hurdles besides just "stand 6 feet apart".

That's why I think the NASCAR "experiment" doesn't really prove anything. Putting 1,000 people in a 46,000 capacity facility, or 5,000 people in an 80,000 capacity frontstretch grandstand is not very much of a test of those logistics and staffing issues.

I hope it all works out, but I wouldn't expect this to be some indicator of how quickly football capacity returns to normal. If anything, it is probably an indication that capacity will remain low for the rest of 2020.
 
Advertisement
It probably won’t happen, but here is what I would like to see.

Let’s assume that in terms of infections, deaths etc by late August we are down to extremely low levels.

If you are willing to assume the risk, you should be free to do so.

As long as participants are made fully aware of the ticket disclaimer/hold harmless provisions that cover the school and HRS, etc, let us be responsible adults and manage ourselves appropriately.

Just a pipe dream, but I’d love to see it.
 
Back
Top